From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932945AbbA0T4H (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:56:07 -0500 Received: from relais.videotron.ca ([24.201.245.36]:16899 "EHLO relais.videotron.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758819AbbA0T4D (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:56:03 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 901 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:56:03 EST MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:40:54 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre To: Pavel Machek Cc: Rob Herring , =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Pali_Roh=E1r?= , Russell King , Will Deacon , Ivaylo Dimitrov , Sebastian Reichel , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: /proc/atags: Export also for DT In-reply-to: <20150127132127.GA869@amd> Message-id: References: <1403110464-29646-1-git-send-email-pali.rohar@gmail.com> <201412041857.49341@pali> <201501262016.52079@pali> <20150127132127.GA869@amd> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (LFD 23 2013-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 27 Jan 2015, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Mon 2015-01-26 14:33:21, Rob Herring wrote: > > These would be non-standard fields which are not upstream. I don't > > know that we care in that case... > > Other devices are going to care about boot reason, too, and we might > as well be compatible... Care to elaborate on that statement please? What does this have to do with ATAGs? Nicolas From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nico@fluxnic.net (Nicolas Pitre) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:40:54 -0500 (EST) Subject: [PATCH] ARM: /proc/atags: Export also for DT In-Reply-To: <20150127132127.GA869@amd> References: <1403110464-29646-1-git-send-email-pali.rohar@gmail.com> <201412041857.49341@pali> <201501262016.52079@pali> <20150127132127.GA869@amd> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, 27 Jan 2015, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Mon 2015-01-26 14:33:21, Rob Herring wrote: > > These would be non-standard fields which are not upstream. I don't > > know that we care in that case... > > Other devices are going to care about boot reason, too, and we might > as well be compatible... Care to elaborate on that statement please? What does this have to do with ATAGs? Nicolas