All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [U-Boot] header files in include/ versus arch/<arch>/include/asm/?
@ 2015-12-20 12:46 Robert P. J. Day
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2015-12-20 12:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot


  working on MPC8360-based project and noticed that what appears to be
a powerpc-specific header file (include/fsl_immap.h) is in the
top-level include/ directory, as opposed to where i would have
expected it (arch/powerpc/include/asm/).

  it's not the only one ... there appear to be others. what is the
rationale for installing a header file if it *appears* to be
architecture-specific? it seems like there's a fair bit of freescale
powerpc content under include/, but maybe i'm just misreading this.

rday

-- 

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
                        http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2015-12-20 12:46 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-12-20 12:46 [U-Boot] header files in include/ versus arch/<arch>/include/asm/? Robert P. J. Day

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.