From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934196AbcJZWuH (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Oct 2016 18:50:07 -0400 Received: from mail-qt0-f181.google.com ([209.85.216.181]:33416 "EHLO mail-qt0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933366AbcJZWtm (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Oct 2016 18:49:42 -0400 Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 18:49:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre To: Richard Cochran cc: John Stultz , "Yann E. MORIN" , Michal Marek , Thomas Gleixner , Josh Triplett , Edward Cree , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] posix-timers: make it configurable In-Reply-To: <20161026201828.GA25143@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: References: <1477448931-29051-1-git-send-email-nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> <1477448931-29051-6-git-send-email-nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> <20161026085102.GC11974@localhost.localdomain> <20161026201828.GA25143@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (LFD 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 26 Oct 2016, Richard Cochran wrote: > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 09:56:13AM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > So if my Fedora usage doesn't need them, we can infer that > > the number of embedded systems also not needing them might tend towards > > a high percentage. > > (I wouldn't call Fedora an embedded distro, but heh...) Indeed it is not. Non-embedded distros usually make more extensive usage of the kernel. Still, disabling POSIX timers doesn't affect it. > > But let's be conservative and say "some". > > Sounds good to me. Does the PTP related part of this series also sounds good to you? May I have your ACK? Nicolas