From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julian Anastasov Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next] net: ipvs: Adjust gso_size for IPPROTO_TCP Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 01:35:17 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: References: <20180419212324.1542504-1-kafai@fb.com> <20180502171041.s3euld6i7hm6bw5c@kafai-mbp> <20180503070114.bcuusvzga45klccs@kafai-mbp> <20180605213128.tlskvjhuk6vx3m6r@kafai-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, David Ahern , Tom Herbert , Eric Dumazet , Nikita Shirokov , kernel-team@fb.com, lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Martin KaFai Lau Return-path: Received: from ja.ssi.bg ([178.16.129.10]:47260 "EHLO ja.ssi.bg" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752166AbeFEWfi (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jun 2018 18:35:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20180605213128.tlskvjhuk6vx3m6r@kafai-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hello, On Tue, 5 Jun 2018, Martin KaFai Lau wrote: > On Sat, May 05, 2018 at 03:58:25PM +0300, Julian Anastasov wrote: > > So, except the RTF_LOCAL check in __ip6_rt_update_pmtu > > we should have no other issues. > Hi Julian, > > Do you have a chance to work on the IPv6 side? I was chasing other IPVS issues while preparing to finalize these changes. I plan to do tests this weekend and to submit my patch but without gso_size modifications. Can post patch for this check in __ip6_rt_update_pmtu too, separately after making sure all is fine. Regards