All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Alexandru Chirvasitu <achirvasub@gmail.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: [PATCH] x86-32: fix kexec with stack canary (CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR)
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2017 11:48:50 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.21.1712271143180.8572@i7.lan> (raw)


From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2017 11:41:30 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] x86-32: fix kexec with stack canary (CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR)

Commit e802a51ede91 ("x86/idt: Consolidate IDT invalidation") cleaned up
and unified the IDT invalidation that existed in a couple of places.  It
changed no actual real code.

Despite not changing any actual real code, it _did_ change code
generation: by implementing the common idt_invalidate() function in
archx86/kernel/idt.c, it made the use of the function in
arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_32.c be a real function call rather than
an (accidental) inlining of the function.

That, in turn, exposed two issues:

 - in load_segments(), we had incorrectly reset all the segment
   registers, which then made the stack canary load (which gcc does
   using offset of %gs) cause a trap.  Instead of %gs pointing to the
   stack canary, it will be the normal zero-based kernel segment, and
   the stack canary load will take a page fault at address 0x14.

 - to make this even harder to debug, we had invalidated the GDT just
   before calling idt_invalidate(), which meant that the fault happened
   with an invalid GDT, which in turn causes a triple fault and
   immediate reboot.

Fix this by

 (a) not reloading the special segments in load_segments(). We currently
     don't do any percpu accesses (which would require %fs on x86-32) in
     this area, but there's no reason to think that we might not want to
     do them, and like %gs, it's pointless to break it.

 (b) doing idt_invalidate() before invalidating the GDT, to keep things
     at least _slightly_ more debuggable for a bit longer. Without a
     IDT, traps will not work. Without a GDT, traps also will not work,
     but neither will any segment loads etc. So in a very real sense,
     the GDT is even more core than the IDT.

Reported-and-tested-by: Alexandru Chirvasitu <achirvasub@gmail.com>
Fixes: e802a51ede91 ("x86/idt: Consolidate IDT invalidation")
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---

I wrote "Reported-and-tested-by: Alexandru" because while this isn't 
exactly the same patch as anything Alexandru tested, it's pretty close, 
and I'm pretty sure this version will fix his issues too.

I decided to try to just do the minimal changes: the GDT invalidation last 
(because of the debugging) and _only_ removing the resetting of fs/gs 
rather than removing load_segments() entirely.

I think making idt_invalidate() be inline would be a good thing as well, 
and I do think that all those "phys_to_virt(0)" things are garbage, but I 
also think they are independent issues, so I didn't touch any of that. 

I'm assuming I'll get this patch back through the x86 tree, and will not 
be applying it to my own git tree unless the x86 people ask me to.

Comments?

 arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_32.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_32.c
index 00bc751c861c..edfede768688 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_32.c
@@ -48,8 +48,6 @@ static void load_segments(void)
 		"\tmovl $"STR(__KERNEL_DS)",%%eax\n"
 		"\tmovl %%eax,%%ds\n"
 		"\tmovl %%eax,%%es\n"
-		"\tmovl %%eax,%%fs\n"
-		"\tmovl %%eax,%%gs\n"
 		"\tmovl %%eax,%%ss\n"
 		: : : "eax", "memory");
 #undef STR
@@ -232,8 +230,8 @@ void machine_kexec(struct kimage *image)
 	 * The gdt & idt are now invalid.
 	 * If you want to load them you must set up your own idt & gdt.
 	 */
-	set_gdt(phys_to_virt(0), 0);
 	idt_invalidate(phys_to_virt(0));
+	set_gdt(phys_to_virt(0), 0);
 
 	/* now call it */
 	image->start = relocate_kernel_ptr((unsigned long)image->head,
-- 
2.15.1.391.gc6612a551

             reply	other threads:[~2017-12-27 19:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-27 19:48 Linus Torvalds [this message]
2017-12-27 19:58 ` [PATCH] x86-32: fix kexec with stack canary (CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR) Thomas Gleixner
2017-12-27 23:06 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86-32: Fix " tip-bot for Linus Torvalds
2017-12-28 22:47 ` [PATCH] x86-32: fix " Eric W. Biederman
2017-12-28 23:23   ` hpa
2017-12-29  0:30     ` Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.21.1712271143180.8572@i7.lan \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=achirvasub@gmail.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.