From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: fthain@telegraphics.com.au Subject: Re: bogl: don't know screen type 1 Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 20:24:31 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: References: <8259f0250908302028n9b0cb56td402539007736fce@mail.gmail.com> <20090831120617.GA1114@marenka.net> <8259f0250908310558l3ddd5fam7d15946a7c1e8572@mail.gmail.com> <8259f0250908311511h77270544vb2dc3dd383f1add8@mail.gmail.com> <8259f0250908311516r49e54c7fi44ead0f040cade30@mail.gmail.com> <20090901151747.GB27514@marenka.net> <8259f0250909021816g2b6a37dfs9bd91c4cabaf457a@mail.gmail.com> <8259f0250909021822k70b1a152sce6ecc651334800@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from www.telegraphics.com.au ([204.15.192.19]:42768 "EHLO mail.telegraphics.com.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752971AbZILKfE (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Sep 2009 06:35:04 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-m68k-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Kolbj=F8rn_Barmen?= Cc: mike , Linux/m68k , debian-68k@lists.debian.org On Fri, 11 Sep 2009, Kolbj?rn Barmen wrote: > On Thu, 3 Sep 2009, mike wrote: > > > I tried to boot 2.6.29 or whatever... It was so slow compared to 2.4 i > > donno what to say, except its crap. Not a surprise if gcc produces > > crappier and crappier 68k binaries anyway. Why the hell isnt freescale > > on top of this? Fuck damn they should be on top of this and the > > 68050/70 the natami is trying out, and bloody include talent like Carl > > S and Dave H that know what the heck the 68k, electronics, and the > > amiga is about.... > > For what it's worth - my m68k systems runs current linux kernel, 2.6.30, > compiled with gcc 4.2.4 just fine, and I have not see any slow-down, > apart from obvious things in bootup, like initiating udev, creating > nodes and similar things that have nothing to do with kernel itself. I > also make sure to compile my kernels with only the modules that makes > sense for the hardware I run it on. What happened to devtmpfs I wonder. > My systems are one A1200 with Blizzard 1230III (030+882@50MHz) and 32MB > RAM, one A1200 with Blizzard 1260 (060@50MHz) and 64MB RAM, and one Mac > Quadra 910 (040@25MHz) with 64MB RAM. Oh and my build box, Aranym with a > 040@100-180MHz depending on host at bootup, and for the time being, > 256MB RAM (allthough, it is down ATM, fixing filesystem disaster after I > somehow managed to launch aranym twice on same disk image :P) Can't file locking prevent that? Sounds like a bug... Finn > > The A1200 with Blizz1230III has been running more or less non-stop since > 1997 with only a break now and then when moving between locations, being > installed into new tower solutions, and infrequent kernel updates, > > I dont use debian though, I use gentoo since it gives me a tool > (portage) to build packages the way I want them, stripped where needed, > bloated for the things I care about. Almost everything is buildt -Os. > > So, in the end, I'm not so sure that what you complain about is for > real. > > -- kolla > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >