From: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>
To: pl bossart <bossart.nospam@gmail.com>
Cc: ALSA development <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Subject: Re: UCM questions
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 14:39:33 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1101231430550.6272@eeebox2.perex-int.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=V9ouox2vp5VYA+_gmsOCCecBKOjpd58DsuaxK@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011, pl bossart wrote:
>> Originally, verbs were mapped 1:1 with cards, however Jaroslav recently
>> added support for multiple cards per verb.
>
> Does this mean for a given verb UCM will return a list of devices on
> different cards that can be used, and the application will choose from
> the list? Or are these multiple cards supposed to be used
> simultaneously?
> I probably need more expresso here..
You may have for example USB microphone and USB speakers plugged to the
system (each represents one card for the ALSA driver with different USB
physical links). UCM can join these two cards as one "virtual", so if an
app asks for playback device, USB speakers are returned and for capture
device, USB MIC is returned. Only one alsa-lib's device should be returned
for given verb/device/modifier identifiers. I admit that the PCM
configuration for alsa-lib allows this too, but UCM handles also the
mixer control mapping.
Anyway, your questions are mostly about the abstract mapping. The purpose
of UCM is to allow any abstraction, so strings in the header file like
"HiFi" or so are just common cases. But anyone can create own abstraction
for different purposes.
Jaroslav
-----
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>
Linux Kernel Sound Maintainer
ALSA Project, Red Hat, Inc.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-23 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-20 22:06 UCM questions pl bossart
2011-01-21 11:37 ` Mark Brown
2011-01-21 15:12 ` pl bossart
2011-01-21 16:43 ` Mark Brown
2011-01-21 20:53 ` pl bossart
2011-01-21 23:37 ` Liam Girdwood
2011-01-22 5:22 ` Raymond Yau
2011-01-23 0:41 ` Mark Brown
2011-01-23 13:49 ` Jaroslav Kysela
2011-01-21 15:24 ` Liam Girdwood
2011-01-21 21:03 ` pl bossart
2011-01-21 23:37 ` Liam Girdwood
2011-01-23 13:39 ` Jaroslav Kysela [this message]
2011-01-24 22:31 ` pl bossart
2011-01-25 12:13 ` Liam Girdwood
2011-01-25 21:58 ` pl bossart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LNX.2.00.1101231430550.6272@eeebox2.perex-int.cz \
--to=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=bossart.nospam@gmail.com \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=lrg@slimlogic.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.