From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:42420) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qykfd-0002Bh-ML for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 09:17:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qykfc-0007mm-HF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 09:17:33 -0400 Received: from fe02x03-cgp.akado.ru ([77.232.31.165]:53995 helo=akado.ru) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qykfc-0007mh-5j for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 09:17:32 -0400 Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 17:17:23 +0400 (MSD) From: malc In-Reply-To: <4E5D9570.1030201@codemonkey.ws> Message-ID: References: <1314752751.84463.YahooMailClassic@web27003.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <4E5D8BAA.9010302@codemonkey.ws> <4E5D9570.1030201@codemonkey.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Add support for r6040 NIC List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, bifferos On Tue, 30 Aug 2011, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 08/30/2011 08:30 PM, malc wrote: > > On Tue, 30 Aug 2011, Anthony Liguori wrote: > > > > > This won't even come close to passing checkpatch.pl > > > > Have you actually tried? > > Sigh. I was hoping checkpatch.pl was more useful than it appears to be. > > At any rate, the patch doesn't follow CODING_STYLE. > Where? [..snip..] -- mailto:av1474@comtv.ru