On Thu, 16 Apr 2015, Javier González wrote:
>> On 16 Apr 2015, at 16:55, Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> Otherwise it looks pretty good to me, but I think it would be cleaner if
>> the lightnvm stuff is not mixed in the same file with the standard nvme
>> command set. We might end up splitting nvme-core in the future anyway
>> for command sets and transports.
>
> Would you be ok with having nvme-lightnvm for LightNVM specific
> commands?

Sounds good to me, but I don't really have a dog in this fight. :)