From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753552AbbDPQMT (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 16 Apr 2015 12:12:19 -0400
Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:63941 "EHLO mga01.intel.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751745AbbDPQMJ (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 16 Apr 2015 12:12:09 -0400
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,589,1422950400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="710289350"
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 16:12:07 +0000 (UTC)
From: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
X-X-Sender: vmware@localhost.lm.intel.com
To: "James R. Bergsten" <jim@thebergstens.com>
cc: "'Keith Busch'" <keith.busch@intel.com>,
        "=?ISO-8859-15?Q?'Javier_Gonz=E1lez'?=" <javier@paletta.io>,
        hch@infradead.org,
        "=?ISO-8859-15?Q?'Matias_Bj=F8rling'?=" <m@bjorling.me>, axboe@fb.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH 5/5 v2] nvme: LightNVM support
In-Reply-To: <057301d0785e$9f8e81c0$deab8540$@thebergstens.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1504161607020.32385@localhost.lm.intel.com>
References: <1429101284-19490-1-git-send-email-m@bjorling.me> <1429101284-19490-6-git-send-email-m@bjorling.me> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1504161433110.32385@localhost.lm.intel.com> <694D3575-E49B-45BB-8E48-7188169B75F0@paletta.io> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1504161528010.32385@localhost.lm.intel.com>
 <057301d0785e$9f8e81c0$deab8540$@thebergstens.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LNX 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 16 Apr 2015, James R. Bergsten wrote:
> My two cents worth is that it's (always) better to put ALL the commands into
> one place so that the entire set can be viewed at once and thus avoid
> inadvertent overloading of an opcode.  Otherwise you don't know what you
> don't know.

Yes, but these are two different command sets.

From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: keith.busch@intel.com (Keith Busch)
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 16:12:07 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: [PATCH 5/5 v2] nvme: LightNVM support
In-Reply-To: <057301d0785e$9f8e81c0$deab8540$@thebergstens.com>
References: <1429101284-19490-1-git-send-email-m@bjorling.me>
 <1429101284-19490-6-git-send-email-m@bjorling.me>
 <alpine.LNX.2.00.1504161433110.32385@localhost.lm.intel.com>
 <694D3575-E49B-45BB-8E48-7188169B75F0@paletta.io>
 <alpine.LNX.2.00.1504161528010.32385@localhost.lm.intel.com>
 <057301d0785e$9f8e81c0$deab8540$@thebergstens.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1504161607020.32385@localhost.lm.intel.com>

On Thu, 16 Apr 2015, James R. Bergsten wrote:
> My two cents worth is that it's (always) better to put ALL the commands into
> one place so that the entire set can be viewed at once and thus avoid
> inadvertent overloading of an opcode.  Otherwise you don't know what you
> don't know.

Yes, but these are two different command sets.