From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54084BB6 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 12:10:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.emea.novell.com (mail.emea.novell.com [130.57.118.101]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82481EB for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 12:10:57 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 14:10:36 +0200 (CEST) From: Jiri Kosina To: Geert Uytterhoeven In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20150707092434.GE11162@sirena.org.uk> <559BEF61.8050904@roeck-us.net> <20150708075409.GJ4341@mwanda> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Shuah Khan , Kevin Hilman , Tyler Baker , "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , Dan Carpenter Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] Testing List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 8 Jul 2015, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > should be sending emails to everyone introducing new build warnings. > > Are people ignoring them? > > Of course people ignore them ;-) I think the biggest problems with these are: - they are all squashed together into one report, totally unrelated things together at one place. Noone is ever going to be actively looking into it to see whether something he's responsible for hasn't popped up - they are not addressed to anybody explicitly. Sending them just to LKML is a direct ticket to the "be ignored" land Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs