From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5AC77AA for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 08:43:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4090E16E for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 08:43:33 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 10:43:31 +0200 (CEST) From: Jiri Kosina To: David Herrmann In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] Bus IPC List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 29 Jul 2016, David Herrmann wrote: > While bus1 emerged out of the kdbus project, it is a new, independent > project, designed from scratch. Its main goal is to implement an n-to-n > communication bus on linux. A lot of inspiration is taken from both > DBus, as well as the the most commonly used IPC systems of other OSs, > and related research projects (including Android Binder, OS-X/Hurd Mach > IPC, Solaris Doors, Microsoft Midori IPC, seL4, Sandstorm's Cap'n'Proto, > ..). [ ... ] > o Andy Lutomirski > o Greg Kroah-Hartman > o Steven Rostedt > o Eric W. Biederman > o Jiri Kosina So I've given dbus1 a cursory look, and I fully agree that this would be an excellent topic; most importantly to make sure that maintainers who have been involved in previous kdbus discussions / reviews get an overview that this is indeed substantially different (and how exactly), and throw away any prejudice they might have gathered in the previous review rounds. Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs