From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steve Thompson Subject: Re: Wrong network Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 07:40:35 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: References: <1297649183.2822.6.camel@perseus> <1297739162.13007.7.camel@perseus> <1297772151.13007.21.camel@perseus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1297772151.13007.21.camel@perseus> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org Errors-To: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Ian Kent Cc: autofs@linux.kernel.org On Tue, 15 Feb 2011, Ian Kent wrote: > Fair call, but it comes over as though you don't want to contribute at > all, which isn't good. That's not the impression I meant to give at all. I _am_ building some new test machines (about ten of them), and I _will_ do some testing. My test machines will all be 32-bit, though, as there is no spare 64-bit hardware. I just can't go testing on a production network; what with this and the hang problem I described in a separate post, I'm close enough to being lynched as it is. I have written my own applications of a similar level of complexity to autofs, and I certainly appreciate that it's not easy, and I definitely appreciate the job that you're doing. Steve