From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from znsun1.ifh.de ([141.34.1.16]:49619 "EHLO znsun1.ifh.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751849AbZJTNQo (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:16:44 -0400 Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:16:42 +0200 (CEST) From: Patrick Boettcher To: Romont Sylvain cc: Linux Media Mailing List , tskd2@yahoo.co.jp Subject: Re: Re : ISDB-T tuner In-Reply-To: <750990.6802.qm@web25608.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Message-ID: References: <340263.68846.qm@web25604.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <4ADD3341.3050202@yahoo.co.jp> <750990.6802.qm@web25608.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 20 Oct 2009, Romont Sylvain wrote: > Dibcom's tuner is only working in brazil no? > the Brazil's ISDB-T and Japanese one is not excatly same, no? On the physical layer it is exactly the same. It is the content (video/audio/data inside the MPEG2 transport-stream) which differs in the two countries. This is typically not handled by the 'tuner', but by the 'backend'. This 'backend' is either another hardware chip or a software-stack. This is what has to be different between Japan and Brazil. -- Patrick http://www.kernellabs.com/