All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
	Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next oops in __lock_acquire for process_one_work
Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 15:58:49 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1205081553250.4497@eggly.anvils> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1336516260.8226.61.camel@twins>

On Wed, 9 May 2012, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 11:11 -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > Please send me the version of patch you'd like to put in
> > (lest I make it up myself and you don't like the result).
> 
> something like so?

More like the one below: I'm not alone in preferring a comma between args!

And you're not a believer in checkpatch.pl, I see: I've removed trailing
spaces; but left the 85-col line, that's not a fight I'll have with you.

I'll set it going when I get home later - thanks.

Hugh

---
 include/linux/lockdep.h |   17 +++++++++++++++++
 kernel/timer.c          |    4 +++-
 kernel/workqueue.c      |    4 +++-
 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/lockdep.h b/include/linux/lockdep.h
index d36619e..968c3e2 100644
--- a/include/linux/lockdep.h
+++ b/include/linux/lockdep.h
@@ -157,6 +157,23 @@ struct lockdep_map {
 #endif
 };
 
+static inline void lockdep_copy_map(struct lockdep_map *to, struct lockdep_map *from)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	*to = *from;
+	/*
+	 * Since the class cache can be modified concurrently we could observe
+	 * half pointers (64bit arch using 32bit copy insns). Therefore clear
+	 * the caches and take the performance hit.
+	 *
+	 * XXX it doesn't work well with lockdep_set_class_and_subclass(), since
+	 *     that relies on cache abuse.
+	 */
+	for (i = 0; i < NR_LOCKDEP_CACHING_CLASSES; i++)
+		to->class_cache[i] = NULL;
+}
+
 /*
  * Every lock has a list of other locks that were taken after it.
  * We only grow the list, never remove from it:
diff --git a/kernel/timer.c b/kernel/timer.c
index a297ffc..6aa7ad8 100644
--- a/kernel/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/timer.c
@@ -1102,7 +1102,9 @@ static void call_timer_fn(struct timer_list *timer, void (*fn)(unsigned long),
 	 * warnings as well as problems when looking into
 	 * timer->lockdep_map, make a copy and use that here.
 	 */
-	struct lockdep_map lockdep_map = timer->lockdep_map;
+	struct lockdep_map lockdep_map;
+
+	lockdep_copy_map(&lockdep_map, &timer->lockdep_map);
 #endif
 	/*
 	 * Couple the lock chain with the lock chain at
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 5abf42f..7d77d1f 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -1810,7 +1810,9 @@ __acquires(&gcwq->lock)
 	 * lock freed" warnings as well as problems when looking into
 	 * work->lockdep_map, make a copy and use that here.
 	 */
-	struct lockdep_map lockdep_map = work->lockdep_map;
+	struct lockdep_map lockdep_map;
+
+	lockdep_copy_map(&lockdep_map, &work->lockdep_map);
 #endif
 	/*
 	 * A single work shouldn't be executed concurrently by

  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-08 22:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-07 17:19 linux-next oops in __lock_acquire for process_one_work Hugh Dickins
2012-05-07 17:57 ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-08 13:03   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-08 16:58     ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-08 17:02       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-08 18:11       ` Hugh Dickins
2012-05-08 22:31         ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-08 22:58           ` Hugh Dickins [this message]
2012-05-09  9:25             ` Ingo Molnar
2012-05-09 20:09               ` Hugh Dickins
2012-05-10 17:52                 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-05-14 21:27                   ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-15 11:11                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-15 15:10                       ` [PATCH] lockdep: fix oops in processing workqueue Tejun Heo
2012-05-15 15:29                         ` Dave Jones
2012-05-15 15:31                           ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-15 20:36                             ` Hugh Dickins
2012-05-08 18:05     ` linux-next oops in __lock_acquire for process_one_work Hugh Dickins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LSU.2.00.1205081553250.4497@eggly.anvils \
    --to=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=yong.zhang0@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.