From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Finn Thain Subject: Re: Add private syscalls to support NPTL Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:19:06 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: References: <4A89D037.7090807@codesourcery.com> <4A8A54F9.3080100@codesourcery.com> <4A8A6CA2.4040806@codesourcery.com> <10f740e80908180222p4d95b19bp3069e037a6bc590e@mail.gmail.com> <4A91A4C8.5040803@codesourcery.com> <4A943ECC.80607@codesourcery.com> <4A97B69F.4000306@codesourcery.com> <4AC5CF12.8000200@codesourcery.com> <4AE5B9B7.7000106@codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from www.telegraphics.com.au ([204.15.192.19]:51124 "EHLO mail.telegraphics.com.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757128AbZJ1BXs (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:23:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4AE5B9B7.7000106@codesourcery.com> Sender: linux-m68k-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org To: Maxim Kuvyrkov Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Andreas Schwab , linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 26 Oct 2009, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: > Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: > ... > > Geert, in case there'll be further changes in the NPTL patch, would > > you like me submit full patch against original tree or only the > > incremental difference? > > Ping. > > Geert, did you have a chance to look over the patch from Oct. 2 2009? > > I've done a lot of testing since then and TLS/NPTL support on > m68k/ColdFire is now stable enough to have no unexpected failures on > binutils, gcc, g++, libstdc++ and glibc testsuites. Nice work. I'm looking forward to eglibc patches so I can build a current toolchain. I suppose you can't really backport to eglibc 2.10 until the siginfo question is resolved. It appears from the list traffic that the consensus is to adopt the generic struct layout here. Is that the solution that you've used in testing? If so, can you send the patches you been testing? Thanks, Finn > > Thanks, > >