All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	io-uring@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] /dev/mem: nowait zero/null ops
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 11:54:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b03a27cd-1e5a-9444-c406-e15c52d2a066@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YTiPoKc9GiG52DNd@kroah.com>

On 9/8/21 11:25 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 11:06:51AM +0100, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> Make read_iter_zero() to honor IOCB_NOWAIT, so /dev/zero can be
>> advertised as FMODE_NOWAIT. This helps subsystems like io_uring to use
>> it more effectively. Set FMODE_NOWAIT for /dev/null as well, it never
>> waits and therefore trivially meets the criteria.
> 
> I do not understand, why would io_uring need to use /dev/zero

Not directly, users can issue I/O against it via io_uring.
 
> and how is this going to help anything?

For files not supporting nowait io_uring goes through a quite slow path.

> What workload does this help with?

Personally for me it's dumping output and benchmarking (not benchmarking
/dev/zero, of course). But I'd also expect any tool that may be using
it but rewritten with io_uring being able to normally use it without a
performance hit.

-- 
Pavel Begunkov

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-08 10:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-08 10:06 [PATCH] /dev/mem: nowait zero/null ops Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-08 10:25 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-09-08 10:54   ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2021-09-08 12:57 ` Jens Axboe
2021-09-08 13:07   ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-08 13:53     ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b03a27cd-1e5a-9444-c406-e15c52d2a066@gmail.com \
    --to=asml.silence@gmail.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.