All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/27] x86/cpuid: Dispatch cpuid_hypervisor_leaves() from guest_cpuid()
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 15:40:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b0d126ca-fb2a-f9ae-1237-11f9531a170b@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <586D240C020000780012D1D3@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>

On 04/01/17 15:34, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 04.01.17 at 13:39, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpuid.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpuid.c
>> @@ -332,6 +332,9 @@ void guest_cpuid(const struct vcpu *v, unsigned int leaf,
>>      case 0x40000000 ... 0x400000ff:
>>          if ( is_viridian_domain(d) )
>>              return cpuid_viridian_leaves(v, leaf, subleaf, res);
>> +        /* Fallthrough. */
>> +    case 0x40000100 ... 0x4fffffff:
>> +        return cpuid_hypervisor_leaves(v, leaf, subleaf, res);
>>      }
> Ah - that's why you didn't have a break statement there. But: Is this
> correct? You're now returning Xen leaves in two windows for non-
> Viridian domains.

Oh - good point.  I think for now I will retain the viridian_domain()
check in cpuid_hypervisor_leaves()

The awkard issue is that the toolstack can provide the xen max leaf
field.  I was considering switching the interface around to having the
toolstack choose all of leaf 0 for the virtualualised leaves, and I am
looking longterm to have unions for the these leaves in struct cpuid_policy.

>
>> @@ -929,83 +927,71 @@ int cpuid_hypervisor_leaves( uint32_t idx, uint32_t sub_idx,
>>              limit = XEN_CPUID_MAX_NUM_LEAVES;
>>      }
>>  
>> -    if ( idx > limit ) 
>> -        return 0;
>> +    if ( idx > limit )
>> +        return;
>>  
>>      switch ( idx )
>>      {
>>      case 0:
>> -        *eax = base + limit; /* Largest leaf */
>> -        *ebx = XEN_CPUID_SIGNATURE_EBX;
>> -        *ecx = XEN_CPUID_SIGNATURE_ECX;
>> -        *edx = XEN_CPUID_SIGNATURE_EDX;
>> +        res->a = base + limit; /* Largest leaf */
>> +        res->b = XEN_CPUID_SIGNATURE_EBX;
>> +        res->c = XEN_CPUID_SIGNATURE_ECX;
>> +        res->d = XEN_CPUID_SIGNATURE_EDX;
>>          break;
>>  
>>      case 1:
>> -        *eax = (xen_major_version() << 16) | xen_minor_version();
>> -        *ebx = 0;          /* Reserved */
>> -        *ecx = 0;          /* Reserved */
>> -        *edx = 0;          /* Reserved */
>> +        res->a = (xen_major_version() << 16) | xen_minor_version();
>>          break;
>>  
>>      case 2:
>> -        *eax = 1;          /* Number of hypercall-transfer pages */
>> -        *ebx = 0x40000000; /* MSR base address */
>> -        if ( is_viridian_domain(currd) )
>> -            *ebx = 0x40000200;
>> -        *ecx = 0;          /* Features 1 */
>> -        *edx = 0;          /* Features 2 */
>> -        if ( is_pv_domain(currd) )
>> -            *ecx |= XEN_CPUID_FEAT1_MMU_PT_UPDATE_PRESERVE_AD;
>> +        res->a = 1;          /* Number of hypercall-transfer pages */
>> +        res->b = 0x40000000; /* MSR base address */
>> +        if ( is_viridian_domain(d) )
>> +            res->b = 0x40000200;
> Could I talk you into making this a conditional expression, as you're
> touching it anyway?

Ok.  I did find the value of 0x40000200 particularly odd (given that we
split the CPUID leaves on the 100 boundary), but it has been like that
for ages.

>
>> +        if ( is_pv_domain(d) )
>> +            res->c |= XEN_CPUID_FEAT1_MMU_PT_UPDATE_PRESERVE_AD;
>>          break;
>>  
>>      case 3: /* Time leaf. */
>> -        switch ( sub_idx )
>> +        switch ( subleaf )
>>          {
>>          case 0: /* features */
>> -            *eax = ((!!currd->arch.vtsc << 0) |
>> -                    (!!host_tsc_is_safe() << 1) |
>> -                    (!!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_RDTSCP) << 2));
>> -            *ebx = currd->arch.tsc_mode;
>> -            *ecx = currd->arch.tsc_khz;
>> -            *edx = currd->arch.incarnation;
>> +            res->a = ((!!d->arch.vtsc << 0) |
>> +                      (!!host_tsc_is_safe() << 1) |
>> +                      (!!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_RDTSCP) << 2));
> The latter two !! appear to still be necessary, but the first can go
> away now that we use bool, and bool_t is an alias thereof.

Ok.

>
>> +            res->b = d->arch.tsc_mode;
>> +            res->c = d->arch.tsc_khz;
>> +            res->d = d->arch.incarnation;
>>              break;
>>  
>>          case 1: /* scale and offset */
>>          {
>>              uint64_t offset;
>>  
>> -            if ( !currd->arch.vtsc )
>> -                offset = currd->arch.vtsc_offset;
>> +            if ( !d->arch.vtsc )
>> +                offset = d->arch.vtsc_offset;
>>              else
>>                  /* offset already applied to value returned by virtual rdtscp */
>>                  offset = 0;
>> -            *eax = (uint32_t)offset;
>> -            *ebx = (uint32_t)(offset >> 32);
>> -            *ecx = currd->arch.vtsc_to_ns.mul_frac;
>> -            *edx = (s8)currd->arch.vtsc_to_ns.shift;
>> +            res->a = (uint32_t)offset;
>> +            res->b = (uint32_t)(offset >> 32);
> The casts aren't really necessary.

Will drop.

~Andrew

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-04 15:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 93+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-04 12:39 [PATCH 00/27] xen/x86: Per-domain CPUID policies Andrew Cooper
2017-01-04 12:39 ` [PATCH 01/27] x86/cpuid: Untangle the <asm/cpufeature.h> include hierachy Andrew Cooper
2017-01-04 13:39   ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-04 12:39 ` [PATCH 02/27] x86/cpuid: Introduce guest_cpuid() and struct cpuid_leaf Andrew Cooper
2017-01-04 14:01   ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-04 14:47     ` Andrew Cooper
2017-01-04 15:49       ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-04 12:39 ` [PATCH 03/27] x86/cpuid: Introduce struct cpuid_policy Andrew Cooper
2017-01-04 14:22   ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-04 15:05     ` Andrew Cooper
2017-01-04 15:58       ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-04 12:39 ` [PATCH 04/27] x86/cpuid: Move featuresets into " Andrew Cooper
2017-01-04 14:35   ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-04 15:10     ` Andrew Cooper
2017-01-04 15:59       ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-04 12:39 ` [PATCH 05/27] x86/cpuid: Allocate a CPUID policy for every domain Andrew Cooper
2017-01-04 14:40   ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-04 12:39 ` [PATCH 06/27] x86/domctl: Make XEN_DOMCTL_set_address_size singleshot Andrew Cooper
2017-01-04 14:42   ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-04 12:39 ` [PATCH 07/27] x86/cpuid: Recalculate a domains CPUID policy when appropriate Andrew Cooper
2017-01-04 15:01   ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-04 15:33     ` Andrew Cooper
2017-01-04 16:04       ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-04 17:37         ` Andrew Cooper
2017-01-05  8:24           ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-05 14:42             ` Andrew Cooper
2017-01-05 14:56               ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-04 12:39 ` [PATCH 08/27] x86/hvm: Dispatch cpuid_viridian_leaves() from guest_cpuid() Andrew Cooper
2017-01-04 15:24   ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-04 15:36     ` Andrew Cooper
2017-01-04 16:11       ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-04 12:39 ` [PATCH 09/27] x86/cpuid: Dispatch cpuid_hypervisor_leaves() " Andrew Cooper
2017-01-04 15:34   ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-04 15:40     ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2017-01-04 16:14       ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-04 12:39 ` [PATCH 10/27] x86/cpuid: Introduce named feature bitmaps Andrew Cooper
2017-01-04 15:44   ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-04 17:21     ` Andrew Cooper
2017-01-05  8:27       ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-05 14:53         ` Andrew Cooper
2017-01-05 15:00           ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-04 12:39 ` [PATCH 11/27] x86/hvm: Improve hvm_efer_valid() using named features Andrew Cooper
2017-01-05 11:34   ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-05 14:57     ` Andrew Cooper
2017-01-04 12:39 ` [PATCH 12/27] x86/hvm: Improve CR4 verification " Andrew Cooper
2017-01-05 11:39   ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-04 12:39 ` [PATCH 13/27] x86/vvmx: Use hvm_cr4_guest_valid_bits() to calculate MSR_IA32_VMX_CR4_FIXED1 Andrew Cooper
2017-01-05  2:40   ` Tian, Kevin
2017-01-05 11:42   ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-04 12:39 ` [PATCH 14/27] x86/pv: Improve pv_cpuid() using named features Andrew Cooper
2017-01-05 11:43   ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-04 12:39 ` [PATCH 15/27] x86/hvm: Improve CPUID and MSR handling " Andrew Cooper
2017-01-05 12:06   ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-04 12:39 ` [PATCH 16/27] x86/svm: Improvements " Andrew Cooper
2017-01-04 14:52   ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-04 15:42     ` Andrew Cooper
2017-01-04 12:39 ` [PATCH 17/27] x86/pv: Use per-domain policy information when calculating the cpumasks Andrew Cooper
2017-01-05 12:23   ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-05 12:24     ` Andrew Cooper
2017-01-04 12:39 ` [PATCH 18/27] x86/pv: Use per-domain policy information in pv_cpuid() Andrew Cooper
2017-01-05 12:44   ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-05 12:46     ` Andrew Cooper
2017-01-04 12:39 ` [PATCH 19/27] x86/hvm: Use per-domain policy information in hvm_cpuid() Andrew Cooper
2017-01-05 12:55   ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-05 13:03     ` Andrew Cooper
2017-01-04 12:39 ` [PATCH 20/27] x86/cpuid: Drop the temporary linear feature bitmap from struct cpuid_policy Andrew Cooper
2017-01-05 13:07   ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-05 13:12     ` Andrew Cooper
2017-01-04 12:39 ` [PATCH 21/27] x86/cpuid: Calculate appropriate max_leaf values for the global policies Andrew Cooper
2017-01-05 13:43   ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-05 14:13     ` Andrew Cooper
2017-01-05 14:24       ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-04 12:39 ` [PATCH 22/27] x86/cpuid: Perform max_leaf calculations in guest_cpuid() Andrew Cooper
2017-01-05 13:51   ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-05 14:28     ` Andrew Cooper
2017-01-05 14:52       ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-05 15:02         ` Andrew Cooper
2017-01-05 15:39           ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-04 12:39 ` [PATCH 23/27] x86/cpuid: Move all leaf 7 handling into guest_cpuid() Andrew Cooper
2017-01-05 14:01   ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-05 14:39     ` Andrew Cooper
2017-01-05 14:55       ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-04 12:39 ` [PATCH 24/27] x86/hvm: Use guest_cpuid() rather than hvm_cpuid() Andrew Cooper
2017-01-05 14:02   ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-04 12:39 ` [PATCH 25/27] x86/svm: " Andrew Cooper
2017-01-04 15:26   ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-05 14:04   ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-04 12:39 ` [PATCH 26/27] x86/cpuid: Effectively remove pv_cpuid() and hvm_cpuid() Andrew Cooper
2017-01-05 14:06   ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-05 14:11     ` Andrew Cooper
2017-01-04 12:39 ` [PATCH 27/27] x86/cpuid: Alter the legacy-path prototypes to match guest_cpuid() Andrew Cooper
2017-01-05 14:19   ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-05 15:09     ` Andrew Cooper

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b0d126ca-fb2a-f9ae-1237-11f9531a170b@citrix.com \
    --to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.