From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46072) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bBgWv-00058S-2L for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 06:52:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bBgWq-00029X-W7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 06:52:40 -0400 Received: from greensocs.com ([193.104.36.180]:57132) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bBgWq-00029Q-IP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 06:52:36 -0400 References: <1465331468-19232-1-git-send-email-fred.konrad@greensocs.com> From: KONRAD Frederic Message-ID: Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 12:52:38 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V9 0/9] Xilinx DisplayPort. List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Alistair Francis , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers" , Edgar Iglesias , hyunk@xilinx.com, Mark Burton , Peter Crosthwaite , Guillaume Delbergue Le 09/06/2016 =C3=A0 20:05, Peter Maydell a =C3=A9crit : > On 7 June 2016 at 22:39, Alistair Francis = wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 1:30 PM, wrote: >>> From: KONRAD Frederic >> >> Hey Peter, >> >> These are all reviewed by Xilinx, this is ready to merge from our poin= t of view. > > This series breaks 'make check'. Specifically, the patch > "i2c: implement broadcast write" causes: > > (cd build/x86 && QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=3Darm-softmmu/qemu-system-arm > QTEST_QEMU_IMG=3Dqemu-img MALLOC_PERTURB_=3D${MALLOC_PERTURB_:-$((RANDO= M % > 255 + 1))} gtester -k --verbose -m=3Dquick tests/ds1338-test) > TEST: tests/ds1338-test... (pid=3D22635) > /arm/ds1338/tx-rx: > Broken pipe > FAIL > GTester: last random seed: R02Se51ed4e024b0f59ef23e564a2a28bb83 > (pid=3D22641) > FAIL: tests/ds1338-test > > thanks > -- PMM > Hi Peter, Yeah sorry I found the bug I'll resend. BTW this doesn't happen with `make check` aarch64, is that normal? Thanks, Fred