All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: thuth@redhat.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, cohuck@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 2/9] s390x: smp: Only use smp_cpu_setup once
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 09:28:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b16cbc73-20b2-4955-52a7-1b133aa33cc4@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9a17ce2d-bfce-0a1f-dfa7-3d798af4d5ab@redhat.com>

On 23.01.20 14:56, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 23.01.20 14:54, Janosch Frank wrote:
>> On 1/23/20 2:45 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> On 21.01.20 14:42, Janosch Frank wrote:
>>>> Let's stop and start instead of using setup to run a function on a
>>>> cpu.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
>>>> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  s390x/smp.c | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
>>>>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/s390x/smp.c b/s390x/smp.c
>>>> index e37eb56..3e8cf3e 100644
>>>> --- a/s390x/smp.c
>>>> +++ b/s390x/smp.c
>>>> @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ static void test_start(void)
>>>>  	psw.addr = (unsigned long)test_func;
>>>>  
>>>>  	set_flag(0);
>>>> -	smp_cpu_setup(1, psw);
>>>> +	smp_cpu_start(1, psw);
>>>>  	wait_for_flag();
>>>>  	report(1, "start");
>>>>  }
>>>> @@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ static void test_store_status(void)
>>>>  	report(1, "status written");
>>>>  	free_pages(status, PAGE_SIZE * 2);
>>>>  	report_prefix_pop();
>>>> +	smp_cpu_stop(1);
>>>>  
>>>>  	report_prefix_pop();
>>>>  }
>>>> @@ -137,9 +138,8 @@ static void test_ecall(void)
>>>>  
>>>>  	report_prefix_push("ecall");
>>>>  	set_flag(0);
>>>> -	smp_cpu_destroy(1);
>>>>  
>>>> -	smp_cpu_setup(1, psw);
>>>> +	smp_cpu_start(1, psw);
>>>>  	wait_for_flag();
>>>>  	set_flag(0);
>>>>  	sigp(1, SIGP_EXTERNAL_CALL, 0, NULL);
>>>> @@ -172,9 +172,8 @@ static void test_emcall(void)
>>>>  
>>>>  	report_prefix_push("emcall");
>>>>  	set_flag(0);
>>>> -	smp_cpu_destroy(1);
>>>>  
>>>> -	smp_cpu_setup(1, psw);
>>>> +	smp_cpu_start(1, psw);
>>>>  	wait_for_flag();
>>>>  	set_flag(0);
>>>>  	sigp(1, SIGP_EMERGENCY_SIGNAL, 0, NULL);
>>>> @@ -192,7 +191,7 @@ static void test_reset_initial(void)
>>>>  	psw.addr = (unsigned long)test_func;
>>>>  
>>>>  	report_prefix_push("reset initial");
>>>> -	smp_cpu_setup(1, psw);
>>>> +	smp_cpu_start(1, psw);
>>>>  
>>>>  	sigp_retry(1, SIGP_INITIAL_CPU_RESET, 0, NULL);
>>>>  	sigp(1, SIGP_STORE_STATUS_AT_ADDRESS, (uintptr_t)status, NULL);
>>>> @@ -223,7 +222,7 @@ static void test_reset(void)
>>>>  	psw.addr = (unsigned long)test_func;
>>>>  
>>>>  	report_prefix_push("cpu reset");
>>>> -	smp_cpu_setup(1, psw);
>>>> +	smp_cpu_start(1, psw);
>>>>  
>>>>  	sigp_retry(1, SIGP_CPU_RESET, 0, NULL);
>>>>  	report(smp_cpu_stopped(1), "cpu stopped");
>>>> @@ -232,6 +231,7 @@ static void test_reset(void)
>>>>  
>>>>  int main(void)
>>>>  {
>>>> +	struct psw psw;
>>>>  	report_prefix_push("smp");
>>>>  
>>>>  	if (smp_query_num_cpus() == 1) {
>>>> @@ -239,6 +239,12 @@ int main(void)
>>>>  		goto done;
>>>>  	}
>>>>  
>>>> +	/* Setting up the cpu to give it a stack and lowcore */
>>>> +	psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
>>>> +	psw.addr = (unsigned long)cpu_loop;
>>>> +	smp_cpu_setup(1, psw);
>>>> +	smp_cpu_stop(1);
>>>> +
>>>>  	test_start();
>>>>  	test_stop();
>>>>  	test_stop_store_status();
>>>> @@ -247,6 +253,7 @@ int main(void)
>>>>  	test_emcall();
>>>>  	test_reset();
>>>>  	test_reset_initial();
>>>> +	smp_cpu_destroy(1);
>>>>  
>>>>  done:
>>>>  	report_prefix_pop();
>>>>
>>>
>>> With this patch, I get timeouts under TCG. Seems to loop forever.
>>>
>> The branch works on lpar and kvm without a problem.
> 
> Which could mean that either TCG is broken or your test is broken (e.g.,
> a race condition that does not trigger under LPAR because it's faster,
> or some undocumented/not guaranteed behavior).
> 

So, the test works every now and then under TCG.

It seems to work very reliably with "-smp 2"

With smp 8, it sometimes works, sometimes not.

t480s: ~/git/kvm-unit-tests (kein Branch, Rebase von s390x-prep) $
./s390x-run s390x/smp.elf -smp 8
/home/dhildenb/git/qemu/s390x-softmmu/qemu-system-s390x -nodefaults
-nographic -machine s390-ccw-virtio,accel=tcg -chardev stdio,id=con0
-device sclpconsole,chardev=con0 -kernel s390x/smp.elf -smp 8 # -initrd
/tmp/tmp.UL9ZaqoKBW
SMP: Initializing, found 8 cpus
PASS: smp: start
PASS: smp: stop
PASS: smp: stop store status: prefix
PASS: smp: stop store status: stack
PASS: smp: store status at address: running: incorrect state
PASS: smp: store status at address: running: status not written
PASS: smp: store status at address: stopped: status written
PASS: smp: ecall: ecall
PASS: smp: emcall: ecall
PASS: smp: cpu reset: cpu stopped
PASS: smp: reset initial: clear: psw
PASS: smp: reset initial: clear: prefix
PASS: smp: reset initial: clear: fpc
PASS: smp: reset initial: clear: cpu timer
PASS: smp: reset initial: clear: todpr
PASS: smp: reset initial: initialized: cr0 == 0xE0
PASS: smp: reset initial: initialized: cr14 == 0xC2000000
PASS: smp: reset initial: cpu stopped
SUMMARY: 18 tests

EXIT: STATUS=1

t480s: ~/git/kvm-unit-tests (kein Branch, Rebase von s390x-prep) $
./s390x-run s390x/smp.elf -smp 8
/home/dhildenb/git/qemu/s390x-softmmu/qemu-system-s390x -nodefaults
-nographic -machine s390-ccw-virtio,accel=tcg -chardev stdio,id=con0
-device sclpconsole,chardev=con0 -kernel s390x/smp.elf -smp 8 # -initrd
/tmp/tmp.csifrEDgnC
SMP: Initializing, found 8 cpus
PASS: smp: start
PASS: smp: stop
PASS: smp: stop store status: prefix
FAIL: smp: stop store status: stack
PASS: smp: store status at address: running: incorrect state
PASS: smp: store status at address: running: status not written
PASS: smp: store status at address: stopped: status written
[... hang]


Note that there is a previous failure for "smp: stop store status:
stack" whenever the test will hang later.


-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-24  8:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-21 13:42 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 0/9] s390x: smp: Improve smp code and reset checks Janosch Frank
2020-01-21 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 1/9] s390x: smp: Cleanup smp.c Janosch Frank
2020-01-21 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 2/9] s390x: smp: Only use smp_cpu_setup once Janosch Frank
2020-01-23 13:45   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-23 13:54     ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-23 13:56       ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-24  8:28         ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2020-01-24  8:38           ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-21 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 3/9] s390x: Add cpu id to interrupt error prints Janosch Frank
2020-01-23 10:02   ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-23 10:03     ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] " Janosch Frank
2020-01-21 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 4/9] s390x: smp: Rework cpu start and active tracking Janosch Frank
2020-01-21 17:40   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-22  8:25     ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-23  9:14     ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] " Janosch Frank
2020-01-21 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 5/9] s390x: smp: Wait for cpu setup to finish Janosch Frank
2020-01-21 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 6/9] s390x: smp: Loop if secondary cpu returns into cpu setup again Janosch Frank
2020-01-21 14:28   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-01-21 17:36   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-23 13:32   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-23 13:47     ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-21 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 7/9] s390x: smp: Remove unneeded cpu loops Janosch Frank
2020-01-21 14:30   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-01-21 17:36   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-21 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 8/9] s390x: smp: Test all CRs on initial reset Janosch Frank
2020-01-21 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 9/9] s390x: smp: Dirty fpc before initial reset test Janosch Frank

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b16cbc73-20b2-4955-52a7-1b133aa33cc4@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.