From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brad Campbell Subject: Re: Inactive arrays Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 17:21:51 +0800 Message-ID: References: <57D99A2A.8000006@youngman.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <57D99A2A.8000006@youngman.org.uk> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Wols Lists , Daniel Sanabria , Chris Murphy Cc: Linux-RAID List-Id: linux-raid.ids On 15/09/16 02:42, Wols Lists wrote: > The tl;dr version of the problem with Greens (and any other desktop > drive for that matter), if you haven't read it up yet, is that when the > kernel requests a read from a dodgy drive, it just sits there, > *unresponsive*, until the read succeeds or the drive times out. And the > drive will time out in its own good time. Yep. I've had great results using Greens but the trick is either TLER or adjusted timeout, *and* disable head parking & spindown. I'm lucky in that all my Greens are old enough they still have TLER. These are the oldest ones with power on hours taken from SMART: /dev/sdq - WDC WD20EARS-60MVWB0 - 5 years 157 days /dev/sdi - WDC WD20EARS-60MVWB0 - 5 years 157 days /dev/sdl - WDC WD20EARS-60MVWB0 - 5 years 157 days /dev/sdm - WDC WD20EARS-60MVWB0 - 5 years 157 days /dev/sdp - WDC WD20EARS-60MVWB0 - 5 years 157 days /dev/sdn - WDC WD20EARS-60MVWB0 - 5 years 157 days /dev/sdg - WDC WD20EARS-60MVWB0 - 5 years 158 days I have one that is only 3 years 242 days (replacement for an early failure), and anything newer than that is a Red. I started with 10 Greens and 7 are still humming along nicely. Like any commodity drive, get your timeouts right and keep them spinning. Regards, Brad.