From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Heinrich Schuchardt Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2020 10:20:58 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v4 1/7] lib: crypto: add public_key_verify_signature() In-Reply-To: <20200717071630.7363-2-takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> References: <20200717071630.7363-1-takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> <20200717071630.7363-2-takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 7/17/20 9:16 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > This function will be called from x509_check_for_self_signed() and > pkcs7_verify_one(), which will be imported from linux in a later patch. > > While it does exist in linux code and has a similar functionality of > rsa_verify(), it calls further linux-specific interfaces inside. > That could lead to more files being imported from linux. > > So simply re-implement it here instead of re-using the code. > > Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro > --- > include/crypto/public_key.h | 2 +- > lib/crypto/public_key.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 2 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/crypto/public_key.h b/include/crypto/public_key.h > index 436a1ee1ee64..3ba90fcc3483 100644 > --- a/include/crypto/public_key.h > +++ b/include/crypto/public_key.h > @@ -82,9 +82,9 @@ extern int decrypt_blob(struct kernel_pkey_params *, const void *, void *); > extern int create_signature(struct kernel_pkey_params *, const void *, void *); > extern int verify_signature(const struct key *, > const struct public_key_signature *); > +#endif /* __UBOOT__ */ > > int public_key_verify_signature(const struct public_key *pkey, > const struct public_key_signature *sig); > -#endif /* !__UBOOT__ */ > > #endif /* _LINUX_PUBLIC_KEY_H */ > diff --git a/lib/crypto/public_key.c b/lib/crypto/public_key.c > index e12ebbb3d0c5..71a0e0356beb 100644 > --- a/lib/crypto/public_key.c > +++ b/lib/crypto/public_key.c > @@ -25,7 +25,10 @@ > #include > #endif > #include > -#ifndef __UBOOT__ > +#ifdef __UBOOT__ > +#include > +#include > +#else > #include > #endif Shouldn't we describe in the header of the file that the code is taken (at least partially) from Linux' crypto/asymmetric_keys/public_key.c? Please, also state the Linux version number. > > @@ -80,6 +83,71 @@ void public_key_signature_free(struct public_key_signature *sig) > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(public_key_signature_free); > > +/** > + * public_key_verify_signature - Verify a signature using a public key. > + * > + * @pkey: Public key > + * @sig: Signature > + * > + * Verify a signature, @sig, using a RSA public key, @pkey. > + * > + * Return: 0 - verified, non-zero error code - otherwise > + */ > +int public_key_verify_signature(const struct public_key *pkey, > + const struct public_key_signature *sig) > +{ > + struct image_sign_info info; > + struct image_region region; > + int ret; > + > + pr_devel("==>%s()\n", __func__); > + > + if (!pkey || !sig) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + if (pkey->key_is_private) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + memset(&info, '\0', sizeof(info)); > + info.padding = image_get_padding_algo("pkcs-1.5"); > + /* > + * Note: image_get_[checksum|crypto]_algo takes a string > + * argument like "," > + * TODO: support other hash algorithms > + */ > + if (strcmp(sig->pkey_algo, "rsa") || (sig->s_size * 8) != 2048) { > + pr_warn("Encryption is not RSA2048: %s%d\n", > + sig->pkey_algo, sig->s_size * 8); > + return -ENOPKG; > + } > + if (!strcmp(sig->hash_algo, "sha1")) { > + info.checksum = image_get_checksum_algo("sha1,rsa2048"); > + info.name = "sha1,rsa2048"; > + } else if (!strcmp(sig->hash_algo, "sha256")) { > + info.checksum = image_get_checksum_algo("sha256,rsa2048"); > + info.name = "sha256,rsa2048"; > + } else { > + pr_warn("unknown msg digest algo: %s\n", sig->hash_algo); > + return -ENOPKG; > + } > + info.crypto = image_get_crypto_algo(info.name); > + if (unlikely(IS_ERR(info.checksum) || IS_ERR(info.crypto))) > + return -ENOPKG; scripts/checkpatch.pl complains: WARNING: nested (un)?likely() calls, IS_ERR already uses unlikely() internally #104: FILE: lib/crypto/public_key.c:134: + if (unlikely(IS_ERR(info.checksum) || IS_ERR(info.crypto))) I cannot find this unlikely in the Linux v5.8-rc4 crypto/asymmetric_keys/public_key.c file. From where did you copy this code? Best regards Heinrich > + > + info.key = pkey->key; > + info.keylen = pkey->keylen; > + > + region.data = sig->digest; > + region.size = sig->digest_size; > + > + if (rsa_verify_with_pkey(&info, sig->digest, sig->s, sig->s_size)) > + ret = -EKEYREJECTED; > + else > + ret = 0; > + > + pr_devel("<==%s() = %d\n", __func__, ret); > + return ret; > +} > #else > /* > * Destroy a public key algorithm key. >