From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Cc: KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: add kvm_arch_cpu_kick
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 17:23:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b1df82b4-dc77-d152-ca0a-c97741df20dd@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e55d4aba-6c0b-f188-1632-d7293c857deb@de.ibm.com>
On 17/02/2017 16:46, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Looks good. The kick does not have to be synchronous and its ok if we
> reenter the guest as long as we execute the request in a timely manner,
> correct?
>
> e.g.
> - kick vcpu
> - vcpu enters SIE
> - vcpu exits SIE immediately
> - vcpu handles request
> - vcpu enters SIE
>
> would be perfectly fine?
Yes, it would. There's some parallel with QEMU's qemu_cpu_kick, where
the signal would be processed immediately after entering KVM_RUN.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-17 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-17 13:10 [PATCH/RFC 0/2] KVM: s390: enable kvm_vpcu_kick/wake_up Christian Borntraeger
2017-02-17 13:10 ` [PATCH/RFC 1/2] s390/smp: export smp_send_reschedule Christian Borntraeger
2017-02-17 15:12 ` [PATCH] KVM: add kvm_arch_cpu_kick Radim Krčmář
2017-02-17 15:46 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-02-17 16:23 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2017-02-17 16:42 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-02-17 17:10 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-02-20 11:12 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-02-20 11:35 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-02-20 21:45 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-02-21 8:59 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-02-21 17:15 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-02-21 19:08 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-02-22 15:29 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-02-20 20:59 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-02-17 17:07 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-02-17 13:10 ` [PATCH/RFC 2/2] KVM: enable kvm_vcpu_kick/wake_up for s390 Christian Borntraeger
2017-02-17 15:23 ` Radim Krčmář
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b1df82b4-dc77-d152-ca0a-c97741df20dd@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.