All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] Issue with the HOST_DIR/usr -> HOST_DIR move
Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2017 21:30:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b1e780c2-dc90-cb52-ccff-fe04fbf2f4ee@mind.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170709182532.40ff2614@windsurf>



On 09-07-17 18:25, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Hello Arnout,
> 
> I've started rebuilding the pre-built Buildroot external toolchains
> after the HOST_DIR/usr -> HOST_DIR move. I've dropped my hack on the
> toolchain wrapper to support the fact that I was moving the toolchain
> out of the usr/ folder... because obviously this is no longer needed.
> So basically, I'm building on top of master + a patch that builds
> host-flex, host-gmp, host-mpc, etc. as static libraries instead of
> shared ones.
> 
> Using this defconfig:
> 
> BR2_arm=y
> BR2_HOST_DIR="/opt/br-arm-full-2017.05-1071-gef605f5"
> BR2_JLEVEL=16
> BR2_KERNEL_HEADERS_3_10=y
> BR2_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT_LOCALE=y
> BR2_GCC_VERSION_4_9_X=y
> BR2_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT_CXX=y
> BR2_INIT_NONE=y
> BR2_SYSTEM_BIN_SH_NONE=y
> # BR2_PACKAGE_BUSYBOX is not set
> # BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_TAR is not set
> 
> I'm seeing this build failure:
> 
> ESC[7m>>> uclibc 1.0.25 BuildingESC[27m
> /usr/bin/make -j16 -C /opt/toolchain-build/build/uclibc-1.0.25 ARCH="arm" CROSS_COMPILE="/opt/br-arm-full-2017.05-1071-gef605f5/bin/arm-buildroot-linux-uclibcgnueabi-" UCLIBC_EXTRA_CFLAGS=" " HOSTCC="/usr/bin/gcc" headers
> /opt/br-arm-full-2017.05-1071-gef605f5/usr/bin/arm-buildroot-linux-uclibcgnueabi-gcc.br_real: No such file or directory
> /opt/br-arm-full-2017.05-1071-gef605f5/usr/bin/arm-buildroot-linux-uclibcgnueabi-gcc.br_real: No such file or directory
> /opt/br-arm-full-2017.05-1071-gef605f5/usr/bin/arm-buildroot-linux-uclibcgnueabi-gcc.br_real: No such file or directory
> /opt/br-arm-full-2017.05-1071-gef605f5/usr/bin/arm-buildroot-linux-uclibcgnueabi-gcc.br_real: No such file or directory
> make[1]: Entering directory `/opt/toolchain-build/build/uclibc-1.0.25'
>   MKDIR include/bits
>   GEN include/bits/uClibc_config.h
> /opt/br-arm-full-2017.05-1071-gef605f5/usr/bin/arm-buildroot-linux-uclibcgnueabi-gcc.br_real: No such file or directory
> /opt/br-arm-full-2017.05-1071-gef605f5/usr/bin/arm-buildroot-linux-uclibcgnueabi-gcc.br_real: No such file or directory
> /opt/br-arm-full-2017.05-1071-gef605f5/usr/bin/arm-buildroot-linux-uclibcgnueabi-gcc.br_real: No such file or directory
> /opt/br-arm-full-2017.05-1071-gef605f5/usr/bin/arm-buildroot-linux-uclibcgnueabi-gcc.br_real: No such file or directory
>   LN include/semaphore.h
>   LN include/pthread.h
>   LN include/bits/libc-lock.h
>   LN include/bits/stdio-lock.h
>   LN include/bits/pthreadtypes.h
>   LN include/bits/semaphore.h
>   GEN include/bits/sysnum.h
> /opt/br-arm-full-2017.05-1071-gef605f5/usr/bin/arm-buildroot-linux-uclibcgnueabi-gcc.br_real: No such file or directory
> /opt/br-arm-full-2017.05-1071-gef605f5/usr/bin/arm-buildroot-linux-uclibcgnueabi-gcc.br_real: No such file or directory
> 
> There are two problems here:
> 
>  * First, the problem that $(HOST_DIR)/usr didn't exist. The reason is
>    that you rule that creates $(HOST_DIR)/usr is only triggered if the
>    Buildroot Makefile creates $(HOST_DIR). But when you're building a
>    SDK inside /opt/foo/, therefore setting BR2_HOST_DIR=/opt/foo/, it's
>    pretty likely that /opt/foo/ might exist before Buildroot gets
>    triggered. In such a situation, your $(HOST_DIR) rule in the main
>    Makefile doesn't get triggered, and $(HOST_DIR)/usr is not created.

 I never thought of that - I assumed that the HOST_DIR would always be created
by Buildroot. But indeed it does make sense to install a toolchain in a
pre-existing directory.

 There is one problem with that, though: in such a situation, it is also
possible that the usr/ directory already exists, so we can't create the
compatibility symlink. I guess we'll just have to live with that.

 I'll make an explicit rule for $(HOST_DIR)/usr to solve this.



>  * Even if the symlink doesn't exist, the build should still work.
>    Indeed, the symlink was kept for backward compatibility reasons, but
>    here I'm doing a full build from scratch, which I would expect to
>    work even without the usr/ compatibility symlink.

 D'oh, this is really, really weird, I'm sure I looked at that piece of code
when I made my initial version of the series, but apparently I didn't look at it
again last week. There are still *three* references to $(HOST_DIR)/usr in
toolchain-wrapper.c...


 Regards,
 Arnout

-- 
Arnout Vandecappelle                          arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect            +32-16-286500
Essensium/Mind                                http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium           BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint:  7493 020B C7E3 8618 8DEC 222C 82EB F404 F9AC 0DDF

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-09 19:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-09 16:25 [Buildroot] Issue with the HOST_DIR/usr -> HOST_DIR move Thomas Petazzoni
2017-07-09 19:30 ` Arnout Vandecappelle [this message]
2017-07-09 19:44   ` Yann E. MORIN
2017-07-09 19:49     ` Arnout Vandecappelle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b1e780c2-dc90-cb52-ccff-fe04fbf2f4ee@mind.be \
    --to=arnout@mind.be \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.