All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>,
	Franky Lin <franky.lin@broadcom.com>,
	Hante Meuleman <hante.meuleman@broadcom.com>,
	Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@broadcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend] brcmfmac: p2p and normal ap access are not always possible at the same time
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 15:52:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b3322e2b-c899-bf30-077e-fb20cddc56e8@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5A949271.3090406@broadcom.com>

Hi,

On 27-02-18 00:04, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> On 2/26/2018 12:22 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 26-02-18 12:01, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>>> On 2/26/2018 11:29 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On 26-02-18 11:22, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>>>>> On 2/25/2018 3:52 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 26-05-17 12:57, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>>>>>> The firmware responding with -EBUSY when trying to add an extra
>>>>>>> virtual-if
>>>>>>> is a normal thing, do not print an error for this.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm now seeing this on another device too, but this time the error
>>>>>> thrown is -EBADE, this seems to be new with recent kernels:
>>>>>
>>>>> Yup. Before we were passing firmware errors up to user-space, which
>>>>> was confusing and potentially be misinterpreted. However, looking at
>>>>> the output below it would have been good to log the firmware error as
>>>>> well. And staring at it some more I suddenly realize I broke the
>>>>> feature detection module with this change. Actually only the GSCAN
>>>>> feature detection.
>>>>>
>>>>>> [root@localhost ~]# dmesg | grep brcmfmac
>>>>>> [   34.265950] usbcore: registered new interface driver brcmfmac
>>>>>> [   34.266059] brcmfmac 0000:01:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002)
>>>>>> [   34.376468] brcmfmac: brcmf_fw_map_chip_to_name: using
>>>>>> brcm/brcmfmac4356-pcie.bin for chip 0x004356(17238) rev 0x000002
>>>>>> [   34.855143] brcmfmac 0000:01:00.0: Direct firmware load for
>>>>>> brcm/brcmfmac4356-pcie.clm_blob failed with error -2
>>>>>> [   34.855147] brcmfmac: brcmf_c_process_clm_blob: no clm_blob
>>>>>> available(err=-2), device may have limited channels available
>>>>>> [   34.857029] brcmfmac: brcmf_c_preinit_dcmds: Firmware version =
>>>>>> wl0:
>>>>>> Jun  4 2017 16:50:07 version 7.35.101.6 (r702795) FWID 01-5e8eb735
>>>>>> [   34.938854] brcmfmac 0000:01:00.0 wlp1s0: renamed from wlan0
>>>>>> [   37.086420] brcmfmac: brcmf_p2p_create_p2pdev: set p2p_disc error
>>>>>> [   37.086431] brcmfmac: brcmf_cfg80211_add_iface: add iface
>>>>>> p2p-dev-wlp1s0 type 10 failed: err=-52
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [root@localhost ~]# strings /lib/firmware/brcm/brcmfmac4356-pcie.bin |
>>>>>> tail -n 1
>>>>>> 4356a2-roml/pcie-ag-msgbuf-splitrx-p2p-pno-aoe-pktfilter-keepalive-sr-mchan-pktctx-proptxstatus-ampduhostreorder-lpc-pwropt-txbf-wl11u-mfp-tdls-amsdutx-sarctrl-proxd-hs20sta-rcc-wepso-ndoe-linkstat-gscan-hchk-logtrace-roamexp-rmon
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Version: 7.35.101.6 (r702795) CRC: 4f3f65c5 Date: Sun 2017-06-04
>>>>>> 16:51:38 PDT Ucode Ver: 963.316 FWID: 01-5e8eb735
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It would be good if we can silence these errors, or maybe at a
>>>>>> minimum lower their log-level from error to warning?
>>>>>
>>>>> I had a look at it and it seems to be a difference in firmware api
>>>>> that we need to support in the driver. Need to do a bit more digging,
>>>>> but it seems an actual issue. You could silence it for now, but I
>>>>> prefer to wait for the fix.
>>>>
>>>> Ok, what is the ETA of a fix for this?
>>>
>>> Actually went back to an old log you sent and noticed:
>>>
>>> [   15.714569] brcmfmac: brcmf_attach Enter
>>> [   15.714756] brcmfmac: brcmf_fweh_register event handler registered
>>> for PSM_WATCHDOG
>>> [   15.714757] brcmfmac: brcmf_proto_attach Enter
>>> [   15.716598] brcmfmac: brcmf_bus_started
>>> [   15.716603] brcmfmac: brcmf_add_if Enter, bsscfgidx=0, ifidx=0
>>> [   15.716604] brcmfmac: brcmf_add_if allocate netdev interface
>>> [   15.716622] brcmfmac: brcmf_add_if  ==== pid:2a, if:wlan%d
>>> (00:00:00:00:00:00) created ===
>>> [   15.716624] brcmfmac: brcmf_bus_change_state 0 -> 1
>>> [   15.717841] brcmfmac: brcmf_fil_iovar_data_get ifidx=0,
>>> name=cur_etheraddr, len=6
>>> [   15.717843] brcmutil: data
>>> [   15.717847] 00000000: 44 2c 05 9e c9 02   D,....
>>>
>>> So mac address of the device is 44:2c:05:9e:c9. However, further down
>>> I see:
>>>
>>> [   17.819113] brcmfmac: brcmf_netdev_set_mac_address Enter, bsscfgidx=0
>>> [   17.819122] brcmfmac: brcmf_fil_iovar_data_set ifidx=0,
>>> name=cur_etheraddr, len=6
>>> [   17.819127] brcmutil: data
>>> [   17.819135] 00000000: aa 3e 81 77 bc 40   .>.w.@
>>> [   17.819864] brcmfmac: brcmf_netdev_set_mac_address updated to
>>> aa:3e:81:77:bc:40
>>>
>>> So the mac address in a local admin variant.
>>
>> Right, this is likely NetworkManager randomizing the mac for privacy
>> reasons.
>>
>>> Now our firmware has a requirement for the p2p-dev interface that it
>>> should be different from the mac address of the primary interface, ie.
>>> wlp1s0 in this log. In brcmfmac we try to do that by setting the local
>>> admin bit, but... as it is already set we end up using the same mac
>>> address hence the -EBUSY.
>>
>> Ah, that is good to know, so how can we fix this? Can userspace specify a
>> different mac-address when it asks for the p2p-dev intf to be created? Or
>> should we do something about this in the kernel?
> 
> So this is the patch I tested. Maybe you can verify it works for you as well.

I can confirm that this fixes the errors, but I do not think that this is a good
solution, using the permanent mac address for the p2p interface has the same
privacy problem as using it regularly. IMHO it would be best to just generate
a random mac address if none is specified. This is what the kernel seems to do
in general when it needs a mac address and none is specified. You can use the
eth_random_addr(u8 *addr) function for this, which will also set the local
admin bit for you already.

Regards,

Hans

> 
> Regards,
> Arend
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/p2p.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/p2p.c
> index 2ee5413..ddbb386 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/p2p.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/p2p.c
> @@ -462,8 +462,8 @@ static int brcmf_p2p_set_firmware(struct brcmf_if *ifp, u8 *p2p_mac)
>    * @dev_addr: optional device address.
>    *
>    * P2P needs mac addresses for P2P device and interface. If no device
> - * address it specified, these are derived from the primary net device, ie.
> - * the permanent ethernet address of the device.
> + * address it specified, these are derived from the permanent ethernet
> + * address of the device.
>    */
>   static void brcmf_p2p_generate_bss_mac(struct brcmf_p2p_info *p2p, u8 *dev_addr)
>   {
> @@ -471,12 +471,12 @@ static void brcmf_p2p_generate_bss_mac(struct brcmf_p2p_info *p2p, u8 *dev_addr)
>       bool local_admin = false;
> 
>       if (!dev_addr || is_zero_ether_addr(dev_addr)) {
> -        dev_addr = pri_ifp->mac_addr;
> +        dev_addr = pri_ifp->drvr->mac;
>           local_admin = true;
>       }
> 
>       /* Generate the P2P Device Address.  This consists of the device's
> -     * primary MAC address with the locally administered bit set.
> +     * permanent ethernet address with the locally administered bit set.
>        */
>       memcpy(p2p->dev_addr, dev_addr, ETH_ALEN);
>       if (local_admin)
> @@ -486,7 +486,7 @@ static void brcmf_p2p_generate_bss_mac(struct brcmf_p2p_info *p2p, u8 *dev_addr)
>        * BSSCFGs need to simultaneously co-exist, then this address must be
>        * different from the P2P Device Address, but also locally administered.
>        */
> -    memcpy(p2p->int_addr, p2p->dev_addr, ETH_ALEN);
> +    memcpy(p2p->int_addr, dev_addr, ETH_ALEN);
>       p2p->int_addr[0] |= 0x02;
>       p2p->int_addr[4] ^= 0x80;
>   }
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-28 14:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-26 10:57 [PATCH resend 0/1] brcmfmac: p2p and normal ap access are not always possible at the same time Hans de Goede
2017-05-26 10:57 ` [PATCH resend] " Hans de Goede
2017-06-13  5:58   ` [resend] " Kalle Valo
2017-08-04 12:35   ` [PATCH resend] " Arend van Spriel
2017-08-30 10:24     ` Hans de Goede
2017-08-30 10:30       ` Hans de Goede
2017-10-19 11:20         ` Hans de Goede
2018-02-25 14:52   ` Hans de Goede
2018-02-26 10:22     ` Arend van Spriel
2018-02-26 10:29       ` Hans de Goede
2018-02-26 11:01         ` Arend van Spriel
2018-02-26 11:22           ` Hans de Goede
2018-02-26 11:36             ` Arend van Spriel
2018-02-26 23:04             ` Arend van Spriel
2018-02-28 14:52               ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2018-02-28 19:43                 ` Arend van Spriel
2018-03-01  8:35                   ` Hans de Goede
2018-03-01 19:54                     ` Arend van Spriel
2018-03-01 22:37                       ` Hans de Goede
2018-03-02  9:53                         ` Arend van Spriel
2017-05-26 11:08 ` [PATCH resend 0/1] " Kalle Valo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b3322e2b-c899-bf30-077e-fb20cddc56e8@redhat.com \
    --to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com \
    --cc=brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@broadcom.com \
    --cc=franky.lin@broadcom.com \
    --cc=hante.meuleman@broadcom.com \
    --cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.