From: "Holger Hoffstätte" <holger@applied-asynchrony.com>
To: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] btrfs: sysfs, add read_policy attribute
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 16:25:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b39e2e18-4116-f77b-df59-d39aa006ea93@applied-asynchrony.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1578372741-21586-1-git-send-email-anand.jain@oracle.com>
On 1/7/20 5:52 AM, Anand Jain wrote:
> Add
>
> /sys/fs/btrfs/UUID/read_policy
>
> attribute so that the read policy for the raid1 and raid10 chunks can be
> tuned.
>
> When this attribute is read, it shall show all available policies, and
> the active policy is with in [ ], read_policy attribute can be written
> using one of the items showed in the read.
>
> For example:
> cat /sys/fs/btrfs/UUID/read_policy
> [by_pid]
> echo by_pid > /sys/fs/btrfs/UUID/read_policy
> echo -n by_pid > /sys/fs/btrfs/UUID/read_policy
This may seem like pointless bikeshedding, but can we please name the policy
without the leading "by_", i.e. only "pid"? By definition what happens is always
"by" the chosen policy, so it's redundant.
Otherwise a great step forward, thank you!
cheers
Holger
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-07 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-05 15:14 [PATCH v4 0/2] readmirror feature (sysfs and in-memory only approach) Anand Jain
2020-01-05 15:14 ` [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: add read_policy framework Anand Jain
2020-01-06 16:22 ` Josef Bacik
2020-01-29 18:26 ` David Sterba
2020-02-11 8:31 ` Anand Jain
2020-01-05 15:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: sysfs, add read_policy attribute Anand Jain
2020-01-06 16:21 ` Josef Bacik
2020-01-07 4:52 ` [PATCH v2 " Anand Jain
2020-01-07 15:03 ` Josef Bacik
2020-01-07 15:25 ` Holger Hoffstätte [this message]
2020-01-08 4:16 ` [PATCH v3 " Anand Jain
2020-01-29 18:49 ` David Sterba
2020-02-12 14:24 ` Anand Jain
2020-01-29 18:07 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] readmirror feature (sysfs and in-memory only approach) David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b39e2e18-4116-f77b-df59-d39aa006ea93@applied-asynchrony.com \
--to=holger@applied-asynchrony.com \
--cc=anand.jain@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.