From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr1-f67.google.com ([209.85.221.67]:42670 "EHLO mail-wr1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729130AbeJaWBa (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Oct 2018 18:01:30 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: renesas: salvator: Switch eMMC bus to 1V8 To: Simon Horman , Wolfram Sang Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Marek Vasut , Geert Uytterhoeven , Yoshihiro Shimoda , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org References: <20181027163410.7417-1-marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com> <20181027163410.7417-2-marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com> <20181028213444.GA1096@kunai> <20181029085721.GC4101@kunai> <20181031124628.buaiuof5ssllalwo@verge.net.au> From: Marek Vasut Message-ID: Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2018 14:03:30 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20181031124628.buaiuof5ssllalwo@verge.net.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-renesas-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 10/31/2018 01:46 PM, Simon Horman wrote: > On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 08:57:21AM +0000, Wolfram Sang wrote: >> >>>> <&sdhi2_pins>;". So, basically the same phandles for both pinctrls. We >>>> can re-add the second one when we need it. >>> >>> I wonder if removing the sdhi2_pins_uhs is what we want to do, given >>> that we might need to adjust TDSEL or pull resistor configurations for >>> the HS200/HS400 modes in the future. >> >> Well, quoting myself "We can re-add the second one when we need it". It >> is possible but a tad unlikely. That's my take on it but it is >> ultimately up to Simon, of course. > > I agree we can add stuff later if we need it. > But can we discuss this in the context of describing the hardware? I'm not sure I understand this remark. Anyway, I'll be spinning a V2 of the patchset, which will be a single patch. -- Best regards, Marek Vasut