From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from radex-web.radex.nl (radex-web.radex.nl [178.250.146.7]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web08.8713.1647605333702087191 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 05:08:54 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=missing; spf=softfail (domain: gmail.com, ip: 178.250.146.7, mailfrom: fntoth@gmail.com) Received: from [192.168.1.35] (cust-178-250-146-69.breedbanddelft.nl [178.250.146.69]) by radex-web.radex.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE9292406A; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 13:08:51 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 13:08:51 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0 Subject: Re: [poky] [PULL][PATCH 0/2] Implement debian packages GPG signing To: Alexander Kanavin , Xavier Berger Cc: poky@lists.yoctoproject.org References: <29294.1624221743778282039@lists.yoctoproject.org> <16036.1647539972048006331@lists.yoctoproject.org> From: "Ferry Toth" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------dZBltSz0drVnHwydp3qaiysp" Content-Language: en-US --------------dZBltSz0drVnHwydp3qaiysp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Alex, Clear. But they are not originally mine, I only fixed them up after rebase to gatesgarth. I was hoping Xavier would respond. I put him in To: now. Thanks, Ferry Op 17-03-2022 om 21:22 schreef Alexander Kanavin: > You need to rebase any patches you have to master and send them to the > oe-core list, otherwise nothing is going to happen. > > Alex > > On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 at 18:59, Ferry Toth wrote: >> It seems nobody is interested in using apt for package management? Strange. >> >> Let me explain: since gatesgart apt requires a repository to be signed. The above linked patches do exactly that. The can still be applied to hardknott and honister. To me seems to be a good addition that brings deb to the same level as rpm and ipk. >> >> On the signing-keys issue, it may be unrelated. Let me self answer this: >> >> signing-keys-dev depends on signing-keys which doesn't exist. It is not built because it is empty. >> >> This is resolved by adding to the recipe: >> >> ALLOW_EMPTY_${PN} = "1" >> >> >> >> --------------dZBltSz0drVnHwydp3qaiysp Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Alex,

Clear. But they are not originally mine, I only fixed them up after rebase to gatesgarth.

I was hoping Xavier would respond. I put him in To: now.

Thanks,

Ferry

Op 17-03-2022 om 21:22 schreef Alexander Kanavin:
You need to rebase any patches you have to master and send them to the
oe-core list, otherwise nothing is going to happen.

Alex

On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 at 18:59, Ferry Toth <fntoth@gmail.com> wrote:

It seems nobody is interested in using apt for package management? Strange.

Let me explain: since gatesgart apt requires a repository to be signed. The above linked patches do exactly that. The can still be applied to hardknott and honister. To me seems to be a good addition that brings deb to the same level as rpm and ipk.

On the signing-keys issue, it may be unrelated. Let me self answer this:

signing-keys-dev depends on signing-keys which doesn't exist. It is not built because it is empty.

This is resolved by adding to the recipe:

ALLOW_EMPTY_${PN} = "1"
--------------dZBltSz0drVnHwydp3qaiysp--