From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steve Wise Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 iproute2-next 1/4] rdma: add helper rd_sendrecv_msg() Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2019 15:50:13 -0600 Message-ID: References: <20190223092615.GM23561@mtr-leonro.mtl.com> <11ec7e04-1bff-e3b2-1b89-db134cd537ba@opengridcomputing.com> <021201d4ceda$56d9e560$048db020$@opengridcomputing.com> <20190303135052.GY15253@mtr-leonro.mtl.com> <007901d4d294$62d5d280$28817780$@opengridcomputing.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <007901d4d294$62d5d280$28817780$@opengridcomputing.com> Content-Language: en-US Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org To: 'Leon Romanovsky' Cc: dsahern@gmail.com, stephen@networkplumber.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On 3/4/2019 8:13 AM, Steve Wise wrote: > Hey Leon, adding this to rd_recv_msg(): > > @@ -693,10 +693,28 @@ int rd_recv_msg(struct rd *rd, mnl_cb_t callback, void > *data, unsigned int seq) > ret = mnl_cb_run(buf, ret, seq, portid, callback, data); > } while (ret > 0); > > + if (ret < 0) > + perror(NULL); > + > mnl_socket_close(rd->nl); > return ret; > } > > Results in unexpected errors being logged when doing a query such as: > > [root@stevo1 iproute2]# ./rdma/rdma res show qp lqpn 176 > error: Invalid argument > link mlx5_0/1 lqpn 176 type UD state RTS sq-psn 0 comm [ib_core] > error: Invalid argument > error: No such file or directory > error: Invalid argument > error: No such file or directory > > It appears the "invalid argument" errors are due to rdmatool sending a > RDMA_NLDEV_CMD_RES_QP_GET command using the doit kernel method to allow > querying for just a QP with lqpn = 176. However, rdmatool isn't passing a > port index in the messages that generate the "invalid argument" error from > the kernel. IE you must provide a device index and port index when issuing > a doit command vs a dumpit command. I think. > > This error was not found because rd_recv_msg() never displayed any errors > previously. Further, the RES_FUNC() massive macro has code that will retry > a failed doit call with a dumpit call. I think _##name() should distinguish > between failures reported by the kernel doit function vs failures because no > doit function exists. Not sure how to support that. > > > static inline int _##name(struct rd *rd) > \ > { > \ > uint32_t idx; > \ > int ret; > \ > if (id) { > \ > ret = rd_doit_index(rd, &idx); > \ > if (ret) { > \ > ret = _res_send_idx_msg(rd, command, > \ > name##_idx_parse_cb, > \ > idx, id); > \ > if (!ret) > \ > return ret; > \ > /* Fallback for old systems without .doit > callbacks */ \ > } > \ > } > \ > return _res_send_msg(rd, command, name##_parse_cb); > \ > } > \ > > > > The "no such file or dir" errors are being returned because, in my setup, > there are 2 other links that do not have lqpn 176. So there are 2 issues > uncovered by adding generic printing of errors in rd_recv_msg() > > 1) the doit code in rdmatool is generating requests for a doit method in the > kernel w/o providing a port index. > 2) some paths in rdmatool should not print "benign" errors like filtering on > a GET command causing a "does not exist" error returned by the kernel doit > func. > > #1 is a bug, IMO. Can you propose a fix? > #2 could be solved by adding an error callback func passed to rd_recv_msg(). > Then the RES_FUNC() functions could parse errors like "no such file or dir" > when doing a filtered query and silently drop them. And functions like > dev_set_name() would display all errors returned because there are no > expected errors other than "success". > > Steve. > Hey Leon, you've been quiet. :)   Thoughts? Thanks, Steve.