From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Ahern Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next RFC] net: Generic XDP Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 09:46:43 -0600 Message-ID: References: <20170413.120925.2082322246776478766.davem@davemloft.net> <20170413.162315.1889531431093534154.davem@davemloft.net> <20170415005949.GB73685@ast-mbp.thefacebook.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: michael.chan@broadcom.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, xdp-newbies@vger.kernel.org To: Alexei Starovoitov , David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-pg0-f48.google.com ([74.125.83.48]:34650 "EHLO mail-pg0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753778AbdDOPqs (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Apr 2017 11:46:48 -0400 Received: by mail-pg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id t187so2361606pgt.1 for ; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 08:46:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20170415005949.GB73685@ast-mbp.thefacebook.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 4/14/17 6:59 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > I'll test it next week unless people beat me to it. > I have run the xdp1 example from samples/bpf. I have a patch that modifies set_link_xdp_fd to take a flags argument which it adds to the request as the IFLA_XDP_FLAGS attribute. That's used by callers to set XDP_FLAGS_SKB_MODE.