All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Claudio Fontana" <cfontana@suse.de>,
	"Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
	"Laurent Vivier" <lvivier@redhat.com>,
	"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
	"Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>,
	"Roman Bolshakov" <r.bolshakov@yadro.com>,
	"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
	Colin Xu <colin.xu@intel.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, haxm-team@intel.com,
	Wenchao Wang <wenchao.wang@intel.com>,
	Sunil Muthuswamy <sunilmut@microsoft.com>,
	Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] cpu-timers, icount: new modules
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 12:01:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b4de7352-87ba-df4c-fdcd-dab4028cef61@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <994492fd-5ae2-52e2-0864-7216ec9dae34@suse.de>

On 29/07/20 10:48, Claudio Fontana wrote:
>> If you want you can add to your accelerator ops series one for
>> qemu_get_clock_ns(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL), cpu_get_ticks() and
>> qemu_start_warp_timer(), that would certainly work for me;
> 
> The problem I see here is, as usual, one of meaning.
> 
> Are qemu_get_clock_ns, cpu_get_ticks and qemu_start_warp_timer
> accelerator-specific cpu interfaces?

qemu_get_clock_ns(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL) is because it needs to take icount
into account, likewise for cpu_get_ticks(); icount is TCG and qtest
specific (with subtle differences between TCG makes icount optional and
qtest makes it mandatory, so further separation of the two concepts is
totally fine for me).

qemu_start_warp_timer() also is accelerator-specific because, besides
icount not being applicable to virtualizing accelerators, the warp timer
is not needed for qtest, only for TCG.

> Looking at their implementation, currently I don't think they are, what do you think?
> 
> Should these be grouped together with
> 
> create_vcpu_thread,
> kick_vcpu_thread,
> synchronize_cpu_state
> 
> in the same interface?

I think so.

Paolo



  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-29 10:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-29  9:35 [PATCH 0/3] QEMU cpus.c refactoring part1 Claudio Fontana
2020-06-29  9:35 ` [PATCH 1/3] softmmu: move softmmu only files from root Claudio Fontana
2020-07-03 17:21   ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-06-29  9:35 ` [PATCH 2/3] cpu-throttle: new module, extracted from cpus.c Claudio Fontana
2020-06-29  9:35 ` [PATCH 3/3] cpu-timers, icount: new modules Claudio Fontana
2020-07-08 14:34   ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-07-08 15:00     ` Claudio Fontana
2020-07-08 15:05       ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-07-08 15:07         ` Thomas Huth
2020-07-08 15:12           ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-07-08 15:15             ` Claudio Fontana
2020-07-08 15:15             ` Thomas Huth
2020-07-08 15:17         ` Claudio Fontana
2020-07-08 15:23           ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-07-08 15:30             ` Claudio Fontana
2020-07-09 18:38         ` Claudio Fontana
2020-07-09 18:46           ` Claudio Fontana
2020-07-10  6:33             ` Cornelia Huck
2020-07-10 19:20               ` Claudio Fontana
2020-07-13 10:46                 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-07-11 11:40               ` Claudio Fontana
2020-07-13 10:51                 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-07-13 11:27                   ` Claudio Fontana
2020-07-10  4:36           ` Thomas Huth
2020-07-10 22:45             ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-07-11  9:14               ` Claudio Fontana
2020-07-11  9:39                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-07-11 11:49                   ` Claudio Fontana
2020-07-11 12:19                     ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-07-11 12:48                       ` Claudio Fontana
2020-07-29  8:48                       ` Claudio Fontana
2020-07-29 10:01                         ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2020-07-30 16:33                           ` Claudio Fontana
2020-07-30 22:09                             ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-07-31 10:59                               ` Claudio Fontana
2020-07-02  6:27 ` [PATCH 0/3] QEMU cpus.c refactoring part1 Claudio Fontana
2020-07-03 17:21   ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b4de7352-87ba-df4c-fdcd-dab4028cef61@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=cfontana@suse.de \
    --cc=colin.xu@intel.com \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=haxm-team@intel.com \
    --cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=philmd@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=r.bolshakov@yadro.com \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    --cc=sunilmut@microsoft.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=wenchao.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.