From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florian Fainelli Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 00/13] phylink and sfp support Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2017 11:11:54 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20170725140138.GK31807@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> <20170801143933.GI23157@lunn.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Lunn , Russell King - ARM Linux , David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f52.google.com ([74.125.82.52]:35399 "EHLO mail-wm0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751211AbdHCSL7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Aug 2017 14:11:59 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f52.google.com with SMTP id m85so1900547wma.0 for ; Thu, 03 Aug 2017 11:11:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20170801143933.GI23157@lunn.ch> Content-Language: en-US Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 08/01/2017 07:39 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote: > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 03:01:39PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This patch series introduces generic support for SFP sockets found on >> various Marvell based platforms. The idea here is to provide common >> SFP socket support which can be re-used by network drivers as >> appropriate, rather than each network driver having to re-implement >> SFP socket support. > > There is a lot of code here, and i'm not really going to understand it > until i use it. I have a couple of boards with SFFs connected to > switches, so i will spend some time over the next month or so to make > DSA use phylink. As is usual, we can sort out any issues as we go > along. > > David, if it still applies cleanly, can you add it to net-next? Agreed, this is in a good shape and the more people we can have testing this, the better. It may be nice to include a consumer of the PHYLINK API for other people to start copying from. -- Florian