From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59241) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bygUW-0001Xd-2m for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:44:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bygUR-0003Oe-4O for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:44:44 -0400 Sender: Paolo Bonzini References: <1476925867-24748-1-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> <20161024134750.GC4374@noname.redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 16:44:33 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161024134750.GC4374@noname.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] less confusing block file names List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin Wolf , Eric Blake Cc: berrange@redhat.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org, armbru@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com, mreitz@redhat.com On 24/10/2016 15:47, Kevin Wolf wrote: > One effect that makes me less than fully happy is that 'git log > block/raw.c' without --follow mixes the history of the renamed driver > with the history of the old, differently licensed one. On the other > hand, the removal of the old driver happened three years ago, so it's > probably unlikely that people confuse what belongs to which one and > revive old code accidentally. Hmm, this makes it sensible to only apply patch 2, especially since Eric has corteously split them. :) Paolo