From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNWANTED_LANGUAGE_BODY, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C43AC433E0 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:28:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64C6964E65 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:28:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229832AbhBLL2a (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Feb 2021 06:28:30 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:35540 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229608AbhBLL23 (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Feb 2021 06:28:29 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B9D4113E; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 03:27:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.110] (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8EC353F719; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 03:27:42 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH kvmtool 09/21] x86/ioport: Switch to new trap handlers To: Andre Przywara , Will Deacon , Julien Thierry Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Marc Zyngier References: <20201210142908.169597-1-andre.przywara@arm.com> <20201210142908.169597-10-andre.przywara@arm.com> From: Alexandru Elisei Message-ID: Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:27:59 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201210142908.169597-10-andre.przywara@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org Hi Andre, On 12/10/20 2:28 PM, Andre Przywara wrote: > Now that the x86 I/O ports have trap handlers adhering to the MMIO fault > handler prototype, let's switch over to the joint registration routine. > > This allows us to get rid of the ioport shim routines. > > Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara > --- > x86/ioport.c | 113 ++++++++++++++------------------------------------- > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/x86/ioport.c b/x86/ioport.c > index 932da20a..87955da1 100644 > --- a/x86/ioport.c > +++ b/x86/ioport.c > @@ -8,16 +8,6 @@ static void dummy_mmio(struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u8 *data, u32 len, > { > } > > -static bool debug_io_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port, void *data, int size) > -{ > - dummy_mmio(vcpu, port, data, size, true, NULL); > - return 0; > -} 0 is false in boolean logic, which means that emulation fails according to the (old) ioport emulation code (ioport.c::kvm__emulate_io()). So I guess I have a few questions: - Is this a bug in the emulation code, where the author thought that debug_io_out() returns an int, and in that case 0 actually means success? - If writing to the debug port is rightfully considered an error, do we care enough about it to print something to stdout like kvm__emulate_io() does when debug_io_out() returns false? Thanks, Alex > - > -static struct ioport_operations debug_ops = { > - .io_out = debug_io_out, > -}; > - > static void seabios_debug_mmio(struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u8 *data, > u32 len, u8 is_write, void *ptr) > { > @@ -31,37 +21,6 @@ static void seabios_debug_mmio(struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u8 *data, > putchar(ch); > } > > -static bool seabios_debug_io_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port, void *data, int size) > -{ > - seabios_debug_mmio(vcpu, port, data, size, true, NULL); > - return 0; > -} > - > -static struct ioport_operations seabios_debug_ops = { > - .io_out = seabios_debug_io_out, > -}; > - > -static bool dummy_io_in(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port, void *data, int size) > -{ > - dummy_mmio(vcpu, port, data, size, false, NULL); > - return true; > -} > - > -static bool dummy_io_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port, void *data, int size) > -{ > - dummy_mmio(vcpu, port, data, size, true, NULL); > - return true; > -} > - > -static struct ioport_operations dummy_read_write_ioport_ops = { > - .io_in = dummy_io_in, > - .io_out = dummy_io_out, > -}; > - > -static struct ioport_operations dummy_write_only_ioport_ops = { > - .io_out = dummy_io_out, > -}; > - > /* > * The "fast A20 gate" > */ > @@ -76,17 +35,6 @@ static void ps2_control_mmio(struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u8 *data, u32 len, > ioport__write8(data, 0x02); > } > > -static bool ps2_control_a_io_in(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port, void *data, int size) > -{ > - ps2_control_mmio(vcpu, port, data, size, false, NULL); > - return true; > -} > - > -static struct ioport_operations ps2_control_a_ops = { > - .io_in = ps2_control_a_io_in, > - .io_out = dummy_io_out, > -}; > - > void ioport__map_irq(u8 *irq) > { > } > @@ -98,75 +46,75 @@ static int ioport__setup_arch(struct kvm *kvm) > /* Legacy ioport setup */ > > /* 0000 - 001F - DMA1 controller */ > - r = ioport__register(kvm, 0x0000, &dummy_read_write_ioport_ops, 32, NULL); > + r = kvm__register_pio(kvm, 0x0000, 32, dummy_mmio, NULL); > if (r < 0) > return r; > > /* 0x0020 - 0x003F - 8259A PIC 1 */ > - r = ioport__register(kvm, 0x0020, &dummy_read_write_ioport_ops, 2, NULL); > + r = kvm__register_pio(kvm, 0x0020, 2, dummy_mmio, NULL); > if (r < 0) > return r; > > /* PORT 0040-005F - PIT - PROGRAMMABLE INTERVAL TIMER (8253, 8254) */ > - r = ioport__register(kvm, 0x0040, &dummy_read_write_ioport_ops, 4, NULL); > + r = kvm__register_pio(kvm, 0x0040, 4, dummy_mmio, NULL); > if (r < 0) > return r; > > /* 0092 - PS/2 system control port A */ > - r = ioport__register(kvm, 0x0092, &ps2_control_a_ops, 1, NULL); > + r = kvm__register_pio(kvm, 0x0092, 1, ps2_control_mmio, NULL); > if (r < 0) > return r; > > /* 0x00A0 - 0x00AF - 8259A PIC 2 */ > - r = ioport__register(kvm, 0x00A0, &dummy_read_write_ioport_ops, 2, NULL); > + r = kvm__register_pio(kvm, 0x00A0, 2, dummy_mmio, NULL); > if (r < 0) > return r; > > /* 00C0 - 001F - DMA2 controller */ > - r = ioport__register(kvm, 0x00C0, &dummy_read_write_ioport_ops, 32, NULL); > + r = kvm__register_pio(kvm, 0x00c0, 32, dummy_mmio, NULL); > if (r < 0) > return r; > > /* PORT 00E0-00EF are 'motherboard specific' so we use them for our > internal debugging purposes. */ > - r = ioport__register(kvm, IOPORT_DBG, &debug_ops, 1, NULL); > + r = kvm__register_pio(kvm, IOPORT_DBG, 1, dummy_mmio, NULL); > if (r < 0) > return r; > > /* PORT 00ED - DUMMY PORT FOR DELAY??? */ > - r = ioport__register(kvm, 0x00ED, &dummy_write_only_ioport_ops, 1, NULL); > + r = kvm__register_pio(kvm, 0x00ed, 1, dummy_mmio, NULL); > if (r < 0) > return r; > > /* 0x00F0 - 0x00FF - Math co-processor */ > - r = ioport__register(kvm, 0x00F0, &dummy_write_only_ioport_ops, 2, NULL); > + r = kvm__register_pio(kvm, 0x00f0, 2, dummy_mmio, NULL); > if (r < 0) > return r; > > /* PORT 0278-027A - PARALLEL PRINTER PORT (usually LPT1, sometimes LPT2) */ > - r = ioport__register(kvm, 0x0278, &dummy_read_write_ioport_ops, 3, NULL); > + r = kvm__register_pio(kvm, 0x0278, 3, dummy_mmio, NULL); > if (r < 0) > return r; > > /* PORT 0378-037A - PARALLEL PRINTER PORT (usually LPT2, sometimes LPT3) */ > - r = ioport__register(kvm, 0x0378, &dummy_read_write_ioport_ops, 3, NULL); > + r = kvm__register_pio(kvm, 0x0378, 3, dummy_mmio, NULL); > if (r < 0) > return r; > > /* PORT 03D4-03D5 - COLOR VIDEO - CRT CONTROL REGISTERS */ > - r = ioport__register(kvm, 0x03D4, &dummy_read_write_ioport_ops, 1, NULL); > + r = kvm__register_pio(kvm, 0x03d4, 1, dummy_mmio, NULL); > if (r < 0) > return r; > - r = ioport__register(kvm, 0x03D5, &dummy_write_only_ioport_ops, 1, NULL); > + r = kvm__register_pio(kvm, 0x03d5, 1, dummy_mmio, NULL); > if (r < 0) > return r; > > - r = ioport__register(kvm, 0x402, &seabios_debug_ops, 1, NULL); > + r = kvm__register_pio(kvm, 0x0402, 1, seabios_debug_mmio, NULL); > if (r < 0) > return r; > > /* 0510 - QEMU BIOS configuration register */ > - r = ioport__register(kvm, 0x510, &dummy_read_write_ioport_ops, 2, NULL); > + r = kvm__register_pio(kvm, 0x0510, 2, dummy_mmio, NULL); > if (r < 0) > return r; > > @@ -176,22 +124,21 @@ dev_base_init(ioport__setup_arch); > > static int ioport__remove_arch(struct kvm *kvm) > { > - ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x510); > - ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x402); > - ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x03D5); > - ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x03D4); > - ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x0378); > - ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x0278); > - ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x00F0); > - ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x00ED); > - ioport__unregister(kvm, IOPORT_DBG); > - ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x00C0); > - ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x00A0); > - ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x0092); > - ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x0040); > - ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x0020); > - ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x0000); > - > + kvm__deregister_pio(kvm, 0x510); > + kvm__deregister_pio(kvm, 0x402); > + kvm__deregister_pio(kvm, 0x3d5); > + kvm__deregister_pio(kvm, 0x3d4); > + kvm__deregister_pio(kvm, 0x378); > + kvm__deregister_pio(kvm, 0x278); > + kvm__deregister_pio(kvm, 0x0f0); > + kvm__deregister_pio(kvm, 0x0ed); > + kvm__deregister_pio(kvm, IOPORT_DBG); > + kvm__deregister_pio(kvm, 0x0c0); > + kvm__deregister_pio(kvm, 0x0a0); > + kvm__deregister_pio(kvm, 0x092); > + kvm__deregister_pio(kvm, 0x040); > + kvm__deregister_pio(kvm, 0x020); > + kvm__deregister_pio(kvm, 0x000); > return 0; > } > dev_base_exit(ioport__remove_arch); From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1C6DC433DB for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:27:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36F7564E6B for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:27:49 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 36F7564E6B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD8E04B4C3; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 06:27:48 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 95W0uySywf4e; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 06:27:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BB4A4B4B3; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 06:27:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 820B04B178 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 06:27:45 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kORcbjD5BfMS for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 06:27:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E82E24B3F3 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 06:27:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B9D4113E; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 03:27:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.110] (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8EC353F719; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 03:27:42 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH kvmtool 09/21] x86/ioport: Switch to new trap handlers To: Andre Przywara , Will Deacon , Julien Thierry References: <20201210142908.169597-1-andre.przywara@arm.com> <20201210142908.169597-10-andre.przywara@arm.com> From: Alexandru Elisei Message-ID: Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:27:59 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201210142908.169597-10-andre.przywara@arm.com> Content-Language: en-US Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Marc Zyngier , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Hi Andre, On 12/10/20 2:28 PM, Andre Przywara wrote: > Now that the x86 I/O ports have trap handlers adhering to the MMIO fault > handler prototype, let's switch over to the joint registration routine. > > This allows us to get rid of the ioport shim routines. > > Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara > --- > x86/ioport.c | 113 ++++++++++++++------------------------------------- > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/x86/ioport.c b/x86/ioport.c > index 932da20a..87955da1 100644 > --- a/x86/ioport.c > +++ b/x86/ioport.c > @@ -8,16 +8,6 @@ static void dummy_mmio(struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u8 *data, u32 len, > { > } > > -static bool debug_io_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port, void *data, int size) > -{ > - dummy_mmio(vcpu, port, data, size, true, NULL); > - return 0; > -} 0 is false in boolean logic, which means that emulation fails according to the (old) ioport emulation code (ioport.c::kvm__emulate_io()). So I guess I have a few questions: - Is this a bug in the emulation code, where the author thought that debug_io_out() returns an int, and in that case 0 actually means success? - If writing to the debug port is rightfully considered an error, do we care enough about it to print something to stdout like kvm__emulate_io() does when debug_io_out() returns false? Thanks, Alex > - > -static struct ioport_operations debug_ops = { > - .io_out = debug_io_out, > -}; > - > static void seabios_debug_mmio(struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u8 *data, > u32 len, u8 is_write, void *ptr) > { > @@ -31,37 +21,6 @@ static void seabios_debug_mmio(struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u8 *data, > putchar(ch); > } > > -static bool seabios_debug_io_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port, void *data, int size) > -{ > - seabios_debug_mmio(vcpu, port, data, size, true, NULL); > - return 0; > -} > - > -static struct ioport_operations seabios_debug_ops = { > - .io_out = seabios_debug_io_out, > -}; > - > -static bool dummy_io_in(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port, void *data, int size) > -{ > - dummy_mmio(vcpu, port, data, size, false, NULL); > - return true; > -} > - > -static bool dummy_io_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port, void *data, int size) > -{ > - dummy_mmio(vcpu, port, data, size, true, NULL); > - return true; > -} > - > -static struct ioport_operations dummy_read_write_ioport_ops = { > - .io_in = dummy_io_in, > - .io_out = dummy_io_out, > -}; > - > -static struct ioport_operations dummy_write_only_ioport_ops = { > - .io_out = dummy_io_out, > -}; > - > /* > * The "fast A20 gate" > */ > @@ -76,17 +35,6 @@ static void ps2_control_mmio(struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u8 *data, u32 len, > ioport__write8(data, 0x02); > } > > -static bool ps2_control_a_io_in(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port, void *data, int size) > -{ > - ps2_control_mmio(vcpu, port, data, size, false, NULL); > - return true; > -} > - > -static struct ioport_operations ps2_control_a_ops = { > - .io_in = ps2_control_a_io_in, > - .io_out = dummy_io_out, > -}; > - > void ioport__map_irq(u8 *irq) > { > } > @@ -98,75 +46,75 @@ static int ioport__setup_arch(struct kvm *kvm) > /* Legacy ioport setup */ > > /* 0000 - 001F - DMA1 controller */ > - r = ioport__register(kvm, 0x0000, &dummy_read_write_ioport_ops, 32, NULL); > + r = kvm__register_pio(kvm, 0x0000, 32, dummy_mmio, NULL); > if (r < 0) > return r; > > /* 0x0020 - 0x003F - 8259A PIC 1 */ > - r = ioport__register(kvm, 0x0020, &dummy_read_write_ioport_ops, 2, NULL); > + r = kvm__register_pio(kvm, 0x0020, 2, dummy_mmio, NULL); > if (r < 0) > return r; > > /* PORT 0040-005F - PIT - PROGRAMMABLE INTERVAL TIMER (8253, 8254) */ > - r = ioport__register(kvm, 0x0040, &dummy_read_write_ioport_ops, 4, NULL); > + r = kvm__register_pio(kvm, 0x0040, 4, dummy_mmio, NULL); > if (r < 0) > return r; > > /* 0092 - PS/2 system control port A */ > - r = ioport__register(kvm, 0x0092, &ps2_control_a_ops, 1, NULL); > + r = kvm__register_pio(kvm, 0x0092, 1, ps2_control_mmio, NULL); > if (r < 0) > return r; > > /* 0x00A0 - 0x00AF - 8259A PIC 2 */ > - r = ioport__register(kvm, 0x00A0, &dummy_read_write_ioport_ops, 2, NULL); > + r = kvm__register_pio(kvm, 0x00A0, 2, dummy_mmio, NULL); > if (r < 0) > return r; > > /* 00C0 - 001F - DMA2 controller */ > - r = ioport__register(kvm, 0x00C0, &dummy_read_write_ioport_ops, 32, NULL); > + r = kvm__register_pio(kvm, 0x00c0, 32, dummy_mmio, NULL); > if (r < 0) > return r; > > /* PORT 00E0-00EF are 'motherboard specific' so we use them for our > internal debugging purposes. */ > - r = ioport__register(kvm, IOPORT_DBG, &debug_ops, 1, NULL); > + r = kvm__register_pio(kvm, IOPORT_DBG, 1, dummy_mmio, NULL); > if (r < 0) > return r; > > /* PORT 00ED - DUMMY PORT FOR DELAY??? */ > - r = ioport__register(kvm, 0x00ED, &dummy_write_only_ioport_ops, 1, NULL); > + r = kvm__register_pio(kvm, 0x00ed, 1, dummy_mmio, NULL); > if (r < 0) > return r; > > /* 0x00F0 - 0x00FF - Math co-processor */ > - r = ioport__register(kvm, 0x00F0, &dummy_write_only_ioport_ops, 2, NULL); > + r = kvm__register_pio(kvm, 0x00f0, 2, dummy_mmio, NULL); > if (r < 0) > return r; > > /* PORT 0278-027A - PARALLEL PRINTER PORT (usually LPT1, sometimes LPT2) */ > - r = ioport__register(kvm, 0x0278, &dummy_read_write_ioport_ops, 3, NULL); > + r = kvm__register_pio(kvm, 0x0278, 3, dummy_mmio, NULL); > if (r < 0) > return r; > > /* PORT 0378-037A - PARALLEL PRINTER PORT (usually LPT2, sometimes LPT3) */ > - r = ioport__register(kvm, 0x0378, &dummy_read_write_ioport_ops, 3, NULL); > + r = kvm__register_pio(kvm, 0x0378, 3, dummy_mmio, NULL); > if (r < 0) > return r; > > /* PORT 03D4-03D5 - COLOR VIDEO - CRT CONTROL REGISTERS */ > - r = ioport__register(kvm, 0x03D4, &dummy_read_write_ioport_ops, 1, NULL); > + r = kvm__register_pio(kvm, 0x03d4, 1, dummy_mmio, NULL); > if (r < 0) > return r; > - r = ioport__register(kvm, 0x03D5, &dummy_write_only_ioport_ops, 1, NULL); > + r = kvm__register_pio(kvm, 0x03d5, 1, dummy_mmio, NULL); > if (r < 0) > return r; > > - r = ioport__register(kvm, 0x402, &seabios_debug_ops, 1, NULL); > + r = kvm__register_pio(kvm, 0x0402, 1, seabios_debug_mmio, NULL); > if (r < 0) > return r; > > /* 0510 - QEMU BIOS configuration register */ > - r = ioport__register(kvm, 0x510, &dummy_read_write_ioport_ops, 2, NULL); > + r = kvm__register_pio(kvm, 0x0510, 2, dummy_mmio, NULL); > if (r < 0) > return r; > > @@ -176,22 +124,21 @@ dev_base_init(ioport__setup_arch); > > static int ioport__remove_arch(struct kvm *kvm) > { > - ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x510); > - ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x402); > - ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x03D5); > - ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x03D4); > - ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x0378); > - ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x0278); > - ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x00F0); > - ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x00ED); > - ioport__unregister(kvm, IOPORT_DBG); > - ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x00C0); > - ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x00A0); > - ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x0092); > - ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x0040); > - ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x0020); > - ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x0000); > - > + kvm__deregister_pio(kvm, 0x510); > + kvm__deregister_pio(kvm, 0x402); > + kvm__deregister_pio(kvm, 0x3d5); > + kvm__deregister_pio(kvm, 0x3d4); > + kvm__deregister_pio(kvm, 0x378); > + kvm__deregister_pio(kvm, 0x278); > + kvm__deregister_pio(kvm, 0x0f0); > + kvm__deregister_pio(kvm, 0x0ed); > + kvm__deregister_pio(kvm, IOPORT_DBG); > + kvm__deregister_pio(kvm, 0x0c0); > + kvm__deregister_pio(kvm, 0x0a0); > + kvm__deregister_pio(kvm, 0x092); > + kvm__deregister_pio(kvm, 0x040); > + kvm__deregister_pio(kvm, 0x020); > + kvm__deregister_pio(kvm, 0x000); > return 0; > } > dev_base_exit(ioport__remove_arch); _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, UNWANTED_LANGUAGE_BODY,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6214C433E0 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:29:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 817E264E65 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:29:04 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 817E264E65 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From: References:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=DQW4Ti/X4W0clmeB1jittLoHlWmWMSo1xSpX7huctK4=; b=J7zcdLecKb5ifaDlvPwQLkMji ZGi6z+2k4oXhPEWOGytW+M/pv/zX+TXtT5fuWsAVMDhJKUsO7uUw7vfxD+qO6h6EfxuJ8Ls051FFg 72ufk1LEYxpE7coNjl4PnM5QDlMn3LDfKrP5HJB6U1+2CQYz8NNUkDAQlQZegI9NwGVFvEPwo+xtB aWWGPkFJ2v+WnKPfANv/yAZ5cu9+GSFkAkv9dP0nYgGsvVNRNA6ZzmIwGBNjXZMUOw7xOb3GXjp2F C6lgd7blHsoLhLtiKzcA7cBQzo/UwXncMbS2MVe5HI6gTZoj8IN5PBlZ7MPLixuXZhXCsDVLBkucy BXxL7z+Dw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lAWc2-0001N4-AS; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:27:50 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lAWbz-0001ME-BY for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:27:48 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B9D4113E; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 03:27:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.110] (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8EC353F719; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 03:27:42 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH kvmtool 09/21] x86/ioport: Switch to new trap handlers To: Andre Przywara , Will Deacon , Julien Thierry References: <20201210142908.169597-1-andre.przywara@arm.com> <20201210142908.169597-10-andre.przywara@arm.com> From: Alexandru Elisei Message-ID: Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:27:59 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201210142908.169597-10-andre.przywara@arm.com> Content-Language: en-US X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210212_062747_516413_6F13AB8B X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 21.28 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Marc Zyngier , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Andre, On 12/10/20 2:28 PM, Andre Przywara wrote: > Now that the x86 I/O ports have trap handlers adhering to the MMIO fault > handler prototype, let's switch over to the joint registration routine. > > This allows us to get rid of the ioport shim routines. > > Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara > --- > x86/ioport.c | 113 ++++++++++++++------------------------------------- > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/x86/ioport.c b/x86/ioport.c > index 932da20a..87955da1 100644 > --- a/x86/ioport.c > +++ b/x86/ioport.c > @@ -8,16 +8,6 @@ static void dummy_mmio(struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u8 *data, u32 len, > { > } > > -static bool debug_io_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port, void *data, int size) > -{ > - dummy_mmio(vcpu, port, data, size, true, NULL); > - return 0; > -} 0 is false in boolean logic, which means that emulation fails according to the (old) ioport emulation code (ioport.c::kvm__emulate_io()). So I guess I have a few questions: - Is this a bug in the emulation code, where the author thought that debug_io_out() returns an int, and in that case 0 actually means success? - If writing to the debug port is rightfully considered an error, do we care enough about it to print something to stdout like kvm__emulate_io() does when debug_io_out() returns false? Thanks, Alex > - > -static struct ioport_operations debug_ops = { > - .io_out = debug_io_out, > -}; > - > static void seabios_debug_mmio(struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u8 *data, > u32 len, u8 is_write, void *ptr) > { > @@ -31,37 +21,6 @@ static void seabios_debug_mmio(struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u8 *data, > putchar(ch); > } > > -static bool seabios_debug_io_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port, void *data, int size) > -{ > - seabios_debug_mmio(vcpu, port, data, size, true, NULL); > - return 0; > -} > - > -static struct ioport_operations seabios_debug_ops = { > - .io_out = seabios_debug_io_out, > -}; > - > -static bool dummy_io_in(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port, void *data, int size) > -{ > - dummy_mmio(vcpu, port, data, size, false, NULL); > - return true; > -} > - > -static bool dummy_io_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port, void *data, int size) > -{ > - dummy_mmio(vcpu, port, data, size, true, NULL); > - return true; > -} > - > -static struct ioport_operations dummy_read_write_ioport_ops = { > - .io_in = dummy_io_in, > - .io_out = dummy_io_out, > -}; > - > -static struct ioport_operations dummy_write_only_ioport_ops = { > - .io_out = dummy_io_out, > -}; > - > /* > * The "fast A20 gate" > */ > @@ -76,17 +35,6 @@ static void ps2_control_mmio(struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u8 *data, u32 len, > ioport__write8(data, 0x02); > } > > -static bool ps2_control_a_io_in(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port, void *data, int size) > -{ > - ps2_control_mmio(vcpu, port, data, size, false, NULL); > - return true; > -} > - > -static struct ioport_operations ps2_control_a_ops = { > - .io_in = ps2_control_a_io_in, > - .io_out = dummy_io_out, > -}; > - > void ioport__map_irq(u8 *irq) > { > } > @@ -98,75 +46,75 @@ static int ioport__setup_arch(struct kvm *kvm) > /* Legacy ioport setup */ > > /* 0000 - 001F - DMA1 controller */ > - r = ioport__register(kvm, 0x0000, &dummy_read_write_ioport_ops, 32, NULL); > + r = kvm__register_pio(kvm, 0x0000, 32, dummy_mmio, NULL); > if (r < 0) > return r; > > /* 0x0020 - 0x003F - 8259A PIC 1 */ > - r = ioport__register(kvm, 0x0020, &dummy_read_write_ioport_ops, 2, NULL); > + r = kvm__register_pio(kvm, 0x0020, 2, dummy_mmio, NULL); > if (r < 0) > return r; > > /* PORT 0040-005F - PIT - PROGRAMMABLE INTERVAL TIMER (8253, 8254) */ > - r = ioport__register(kvm, 0x0040, &dummy_read_write_ioport_ops, 4, NULL); > + r = kvm__register_pio(kvm, 0x0040, 4, dummy_mmio, NULL); > if (r < 0) > return r; > > /* 0092 - PS/2 system control port A */ > - r = ioport__register(kvm, 0x0092, &ps2_control_a_ops, 1, NULL); > + r = kvm__register_pio(kvm, 0x0092, 1, ps2_control_mmio, NULL); > if (r < 0) > return r; > > /* 0x00A0 - 0x00AF - 8259A PIC 2 */ > - r = ioport__register(kvm, 0x00A0, &dummy_read_write_ioport_ops, 2, NULL); > + r = kvm__register_pio(kvm, 0x00A0, 2, dummy_mmio, NULL); > if (r < 0) > return r; > > /* 00C0 - 001F - DMA2 controller */ > - r = ioport__register(kvm, 0x00C0, &dummy_read_write_ioport_ops, 32, NULL); > + r = kvm__register_pio(kvm, 0x00c0, 32, dummy_mmio, NULL); > if (r < 0) > return r; > > /* PORT 00E0-00EF are 'motherboard specific' so we use them for our > internal debugging purposes. */ > - r = ioport__register(kvm, IOPORT_DBG, &debug_ops, 1, NULL); > + r = kvm__register_pio(kvm, IOPORT_DBG, 1, dummy_mmio, NULL); > if (r < 0) > return r; > > /* PORT 00ED - DUMMY PORT FOR DELAY??? */ > - r = ioport__register(kvm, 0x00ED, &dummy_write_only_ioport_ops, 1, NULL); > + r = kvm__register_pio(kvm, 0x00ed, 1, dummy_mmio, NULL); > if (r < 0) > return r; > > /* 0x00F0 - 0x00FF - Math co-processor */ > - r = ioport__register(kvm, 0x00F0, &dummy_write_only_ioport_ops, 2, NULL); > + r = kvm__register_pio(kvm, 0x00f0, 2, dummy_mmio, NULL); > if (r < 0) > return r; > > /* PORT 0278-027A - PARALLEL PRINTER PORT (usually LPT1, sometimes LPT2) */ > - r = ioport__register(kvm, 0x0278, &dummy_read_write_ioport_ops, 3, NULL); > + r = kvm__register_pio(kvm, 0x0278, 3, dummy_mmio, NULL); > if (r < 0) > return r; > > /* PORT 0378-037A - PARALLEL PRINTER PORT (usually LPT2, sometimes LPT3) */ > - r = ioport__register(kvm, 0x0378, &dummy_read_write_ioport_ops, 3, NULL); > + r = kvm__register_pio(kvm, 0x0378, 3, dummy_mmio, NULL); > if (r < 0) > return r; > > /* PORT 03D4-03D5 - COLOR VIDEO - CRT CONTROL REGISTERS */ > - r = ioport__register(kvm, 0x03D4, &dummy_read_write_ioport_ops, 1, NULL); > + r = kvm__register_pio(kvm, 0x03d4, 1, dummy_mmio, NULL); > if (r < 0) > return r; > - r = ioport__register(kvm, 0x03D5, &dummy_write_only_ioport_ops, 1, NULL); > + r = kvm__register_pio(kvm, 0x03d5, 1, dummy_mmio, NULL); > if (r < 0) > return r; > > - r = ioport__register(kvm, 0x402, &seabios_debug_ops, 1, NULL); > + r = kvm__register_pio(kvm, 0x0402, 1, seabios_debug_mmio, NULL); > if (r < 0) > return r; > > /* 0510 - QEMU BIOS configuration register */ > - r = ioport__register(kvm, 0x510, &dummy_read_write_ioport_ops, 2, NULL); > + r = kvm__register_pio(kvm, 0x0510, 2, dummy_mmio, NULL); > if (r < 0) > return r; > > @@ -176,22 +124,21 @@ dev_base_init(ioport__setup_arch); > > static int ioport__remove_arch(struct kvm *kvm) > { > - ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x510); > - ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x402); > - ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x03D5); > - ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x03D4); > - ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x0378); > - ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x0278); > - ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x00F0); > - ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x00ED); > - ioport__unregister(kvm, IOPORT_DBG); > - ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x00C0); > - ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x00A0); > - ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x0092); > - ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x0040); > - ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x0020); > - ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x0000); > - > + kvm__deregister_pio(kvm, 0x510); > + kvm__deregister_pio(kvm, 0x402); > + kvm__deregister_pio(kvm, 0x3d5); > + kvm__deregister_pio(kvm, 0x3d4); > + kvm__deregister_pio(kvm, 0x378); > + kvm__deregister_pio(kvm, 0x278); > + kvm__deregister_pio(kvm, 0x0f0); > + kvm__deregister_pio(kvm, 0x0ed); > + kvm__deregister_pio(kvm, IOPORT_DBG); > + kvm__deregister_pio(kvm, 0x0c0); > + kvm__deregister_pio(kvm, 0x0a0); > + kvm__deregister_pio(kvm, 0x092); > + kvm__deregister_pio(kvm, 0x040); > + kvm__deregister_pio(kvm, 0x020); > + kvm__deregister_pio(kvm, 0x000); > return 0; > } > dev_base_exit(ioport__remove_arch); _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel