From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55418) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gBO5S-00086I-3y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 13 Oct 2018 13:52:26 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gBO5O-0001RM-T7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 13 Oct 2018 13:52:26 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x444.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::444]:33693) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gBO5O-00017o-Fo for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 13 Oct 2018 13:52:22 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-x444.google.com with SMTP id 78-v6so5333220pfq.0 for ; Sat, 13 Oct 2018 10:52:20 -0700 (PDT) References: <20181012173047.25420-1-kbastian@mail.uni-paderborn.de> <20181012173047.25420-15-kbastian@mail.uni-paderborn.de> From: Richard Henderson Message-ID: Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2018 10:52:16 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20181012173047.25420-15-kbastian@mail.uni-paderborn.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 14/28] target/riscv: Convert RV priv insns to decodetree List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Bastian Koppelmann , mjc@sifive.com, palmer@sifive.com, sagark@eecs.berkeley.edu Cc: peer.adelt@hni.uni-paderborn.de, Alistair.Francis@wdc.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 10/12/18 10:30 AM, Bastian Koppelmann wrote: > +static bool trans_sfence_vma(DisasContext *ctx, arg_sfence_vma *a, > + uint32_t insn) > +{ > +#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY > + gen_helper_tlb_flush(cpu_env); > + return true; > +#else > + return false; > +#endif > +} > + > +static bool trans_sfence_vm(DisasContext *ctx, arg_sfence_vm *a, uint32_t insn) > +{ > +#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY > + gen_helper_tlb_flush(cpu_env); > + return true; > +#else > + return false; > +#endif > +} Out of curiosity, are we missing a check for priv_ver in each of these? If so it's missing in the original source, so definitely a different patch. Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson r~