From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E464CA9EAD for ; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 10:28:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A16CA218BA for ; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 10:28:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=c-s.fr header.i=@c-s.fr header.b="ZiUIFUHz" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A16CA218BA Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=c-s.fr Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46wwvt5zjBzDqpp for ; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 21:28:10 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from ozlabs.org (bilbo.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46wwsW5qP9zDqLl for ; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 21:26:07 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=c-s.fr Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=c-s.fr header.i=@c-s.fr header.b="ZiUIFUHz"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from ozlabs.org (bilbo.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::2]) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46wwsV3l24z8swC for ; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 21:26:06 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by ozlabs.org (Postfix) id 46wwsV23F2z9sP7; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 21:26:06 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=c-s.fr (client-ip=93.17.236.30; helo=pegase1.c-s.fr; envelope-from=christophe.leroy@c-s.fr; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=c-s.fr Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=c-s.fr header.i=@c-s.fr header.b="ZiUIFUHz"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from pegase1.c-s.fr (pegase1.c-s.fr [93.17.236.30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46wwsS4C0Rz9sNx for ; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 21:26:01 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from localhost (mailhub1-int [192.168.12.234]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46wwsH4YtDz9txvP; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 12:25:55 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: localhost; dkim=pass reason="1024-bit key; insecure key" header.d=c-s.fr header.i=@c-s.fr header.b=ZiUIFUHz; dkim-adsp=pass; dkim-atps=neutral X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at c-s.fr Received: from pegase1.c-s.fr ([192.168.12.234]) by localhost (pegase1.c-s.fr [192.168.12.234]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OEtWxn8g5DW1; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 12:25:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from messagerie.si.c-s.fr (messagerie.si.c-s.fr [192.168.25.192]) by pegase1.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46wwsH3Wl5z9v0DX; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 12:25:55 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=c-s.fr; s=mail; t=1571567155; bh=CBGWSUvTTQ6v/xwD1tEuw1dPPmHh00ky9Qd+WeXNoZs=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=ZiUIFUHzRyjZgGQZ6GXrhPXBwU2LWrKW7i5wrTLo0GCvExvBdABazM0IgrNRdAGAA ATz3919+l0WeMHeG3RM4xI6liuN7MO8o6m2p8lWySoaRYcfqgj/2NtIAb83DLUCcdb d45hv8ncFs9une/uZKzIUUjHzaYvjKvXkcZgD+Ec= Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by messagerie.si.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D51D8B8A9; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 12:25:58 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at c-s.fr Received: from messagerie.si.c-s.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (messagerie.si.c-s.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id 2YaREXtXbuvN; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 12:25:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.4.90] (unknown [192.168.4.90]) by messagerie.si.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26FFB8B8A5; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 12:25:57 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: passing NULL to clock_getres (VDSO): terminated by unexpected signal 11 To: Andreas Schwab , Thomas Gleixner References: <0fc22a08-31d9-e4d1-557e-bf5b482a9a20__6444.28012180782$1571503753$gmane$org@c-s.fr> <87v9skcznp.fsf@igel.home> <87tv83zqt1.fsf@hase.home> From: Christophe Leroy Message-ID: Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2019 12:25:57 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87tv83zqt1.fsf@hase.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: fr Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Nathan Lynch , "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" , Vincenzo Frascino Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Adding Thomas to the discussion as the commit is from him. Le 20/10/2019 à 11:53, Andreas Schwab a écrit : > On Okt 20 2019, Christophe Leroy wrote: > >> Le 19/10/2019 à 21:18, Andreas Schwab a écrit : >>> On Okt 19 2019, Christophe Leroy wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Nathan, >>>> >>>> While trying to switch powerpc VDSO to C version of gettimeofday(), I'm >>>> getting the following kind of error with vdsotest: >>>> >>>> passing NULL to clock_getres (VDSO): terminated by unexpected signal 11 >>>> >>>> Looking at commit a9446a906f52 ("lib/vdso/32: Remove inconsistent NULL >>>> pointer checks"), it seems that signal 11 is expected when passing NULL >>>> pointer. >>>> >>>> Any plan to fix vdsotest ? >>> >>> Passing NULL to clock_getres is valid, and required to return >>> successfully if the clock id is valid. >>> >> >> Do you mean the following commit is wrong ? >> >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/lib/vdso?id=a9446a906f52292c52ecbd5be78eaa4d8395756c > > If it causes a valid call to clock_getres to fail, then yes. > > Andreas. >