From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jeff Chua" Subject: Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 1) Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 09:32:30 +0800 Message-ID: References: <20070226220152.GA29575@stusta.de> <20070228211318.GB4301@mellanox.co.il> <20070305000421.GF3441@stusta.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.186]:39582 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933781AbXCFBcc (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2007 20:32:32 -0500 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id o25so2297537nfa for ; Mon, 05 Mar 2007 17:32:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20070305000421.GF3441@stusta.de> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Adrian Bunk Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Pavel Machek , linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, Ingo Molnar , lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On 3/5/07, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > I have the same problem on my IBM X60s on rc1 and rc2. Can't resume > > from RAM, can't suspend to disk. It is possible to revert all the > > changes to ACPI and test it? > > This is with CONFIG_KVM=n? Yes.