From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36880) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1djf47-0005GH-DP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 01:15:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1djf44-00061S-7F for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 01:15:55 -0400 Received: from mail.cn.fujitsu.com ([183.91.158.132]:40641 helo=heian.cn.fujitsu.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1djf43-0005qI-S4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 01:15:52 -0400 References: <1500449399-19107-1-git-send-email-zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> From: Zhang Chen Message-ID: Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 13:17:39 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V3 0/4] Optimize COLO-compare performance List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jason Wang , qemu devel Cc: zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com, zhanghailiang , Li Zhijian , "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" On 08/21/2017 11:55 AM, Jason Wang wrote: > > > On 2017年08月21日 09:45, Zhang Chen wrote: >> Hi~~ All~ >> >> No one review this series for a long time. >> >> Ping... >> >> > > Looks ok to me. But I don't like patch 1 since it adds more TODO > especially for a non-exist function colo_notify_checkpoint(). > > I tend to have it after colo_notify_checkpoint() is implemented or > merged. > I got your point, I will send the V4 without patch1. Thanks Zhang Chen > Thanks > > > > -- Thanks Zhang Chen