All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: williams@redhat.com, daniel@bristot.me,
	"Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>,
	"Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz@gmail.com>,
	Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it>
Subject: [RFC 1/3] softirq: Use preempt_latency_stop/start to trace preemption
Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 17:16:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b6bb4705efb0c01c11008ae3c46bc74555245303.1559051152.git.bristot@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1559051152.git.bristot@redhat.com>

prempt_disable/enable tracepoints occurs only in the preemption
enabled <-> disable transition. As preempt_latency_stop() and
preempt_latency_start() already do this control, avoid code
duplication by using these functions in the softirq code as well.

RFC: Should we move preempt_latency_start/preempt_latency_stop
to a trace source file... or even a header?

Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Cc: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Cc: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz@gmail.com>
Cc: Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
 kernel/sched/core.c |  4 ++--
 kernel/softirq.c    | 13 +++++--------
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 874c427742a9..8c0b414e45dc 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -3152,7 +3152,7 @@ static inline void sched_tick_stop(int cpu) { }
  * If the value passed in is equal to the current preempt count
  * then we just disabled preemption. Start timing the latency.
  */
-static inline void preempt_latency_start(int val)
+void preempt_latency_start(int val)
 {
 	if (preempt_count() == val) {
 		unsigned long ip = get_lock_parent_ip();
@@ -3189,7 +3189,7 @@ NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(preempt_count_add);
  * If the value passed in equals to the current preempt count
  * then we just enabled preemption. Stop timing the latency.
  */
-static inline void preempt_latency_stop(int val)
+void preempt_latency_stop(int val)
 {
 	if (preempt_count() == val)
 		trace_preempt_on(CALLER_ADDR0, get_lock_parent_ip());
diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
index 2c3382378d94..c9ad89c3dfed 100644
--- a/kernel/softirq.c
+++ b/kernel/softirq.c
@@ -108,6 +108,8 @@ static bool ksoftirqd_running(unsigned long pending)
  * where hardirqs are disabled legitimately:
  */
 #ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
+extern void preempt_latency_start(int val);
+extern void preempt_latency_stop(int val);
 void __local_bh_disable_ip(unsigned long ip, unsigned int cnt)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
@@ -130,12 +132,8 @@ void __local_bh_disable_ip(unsigned long ip, unsigned int cnt)
 		trace_softirqs_off(ip);
 	raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
 
-	if (preempt_count() == cnt) {
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT
-		current->preempt_disable_ip = get_lock_parent_ip();
-#endif
-		trace_preempt_off(CALLER_ADDR0, get_lock_parent_ip());
-	}
+	preempt_latency_start(cnt);
+
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__local_bh_disable_ip);
 #endif /* CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS */
@@ -144,8 +142,7 @@ static void __local_bh_enable(unsigned int cnt)
 {
 	lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
 
-	if (preempt_count() == cnt)
-		trace_preempt_on(CALLER_ADDR0, get_lock_parent_ip());
+	preempt_latency_stop(cnt);
 
 	if (softirq_count() == (cnt & SOFTIRQ_MASK))
 		trace_softirqs_on(_RET_IP_);
-- 
2.20.1


  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-28 15:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-28 15:16 [RFC 0/3] preempt_tracer: Fix preempt_disable tracepoint Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2019-05-28 15:16 ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira [this message]
2019-05-29  8:29   ` [RFC 1/3] softirq: Use preempt_latency_stop/start to trace preemption Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-29  9:30   ` Joel Fernandes
2019-05-29 12:22     ` Steven Rostedt
2019-06-04 10:39       ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2019-06-04 12:01         ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-28 15:16 ` [RFC 2/3] preempt_tracer: Disable IRQ while starting/stopping due to a preempt_counter change Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2019-05-29  8:33   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-29  9:40     ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2019-05-29 10:20       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-29 12:39         ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-29 13:19           ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-29 13:29             ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-29 13:42             ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-29 13:49               ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-29 13:58                 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-29 13:51         ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2019-05-29 18:21           ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-06-04 10:20             ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2019-05-31  7:47       ` Joel Fernandes
2019-06-04 10:12         ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2019-06-04 15:01           ` Steven Rostedt
2019-06-05 15:16             ` Joel Fernandes
2019-05-28 15:16 ` [RFC 3/3] preempt_tracer: Use a percpu variable to control traceble calls Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2019-05-29  8:41   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-29  9:48     ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b6bb4705efb0c01c11008ae3c46bc74555245303.1559051152.git.bristot@redhat.com \
    --to=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=daniel@bristot.me \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mka@chromium.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tiny.windzz@gmail.com \
    --cc=tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it \
    --cc=williams@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.