From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2452FC10F14 for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 03:02:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C23F21773 for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 03:02:43 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3C23F21773 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44kRqh6tt2zDqNv for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 13:02:40 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44kRnm02BMzDq8X for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 13:00:59 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098393.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x3H2tYee100663 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 23:00:56 -0400 Received: from e36.co.us.ibm.com (e36.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.154]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2rwr247akm-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 23:00:56 -0400 Received: from localhost by e36.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 04:00:55 +0100 Received: from b03cxnp08027.gho.boulder.ibm.com (9.17.130.19) by e36.co.us.ibm.com (192.168.1.136) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Wed, 17 Apr 2019 04:00:54 +0100 Received: from b03ledav003.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav003.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.234]) by b03cxnp08027.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x3H30quC45678668 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 17 Apr 2019 03:00:53 GMT Received: from b03ledav003.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EAB36A054; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 03:00:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b03ledav003.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33E496A057; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 03:00:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.199.40.202] (unknown [9.199.40.202]) by b03ledav003.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 03:00:50 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/8] powerpc/mm: Consolidate radix and hash address map details To: Nicholas Piggin , mpe@ellerman.id.au, paulus@samba.org References: <20190416100722.10324-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> <20190416100722.10324-8-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> <1555422365.eio3zgx55b.astroid@bobo.none> From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 08:30:49 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1555422365.eio3zgx55b.astroid@bobo.none> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19041703-0020-0000-0000-00000ED89E4C X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00010941; HX=3.00000242; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000284; SDB=6.01190175; UDB=6.00623652; IPR=6.00970972; MB=3.00026475; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2019-04-17 03:00:55 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19041703-0021-0000-0000-00006575F9D8 Message-Id: X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-04-17_02:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=822 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1904170017 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On 4/16/19 7:33 PM, Nicholas Piggin wrote: > Aneesh Kumar K.V's on April 16, 2019 8:07 pm: >> We now have >> >> 4K page size config >> >> kernel_region_map_size = 16TB >> kernel vmalloc start = 0xc000100000000000 >> kernel IO start = 0xc000200000000000 >> kernel vmemmap start = 0xc000300000000000 >> >> with 64K page size config: >> >> kernel_region_map_size = 512TB >> kernel vmalloc start = 0xc008000000000000 >> kernel IO start = 0xc00a000000000000 >> kernel vmemmap start = 0xc00c000000000000 > > Hey Aneesh, > > I like the series, I like consolidating the address spaces into 0xc, > and making the layouts match or similar isn't a bad thing. I don't > see any real reason to force limitations on one layout or another -- > you could make the argument that 4k radix should match 64k radix > as much as matching 4k hash IMO. > > I wouldn't like to tie them too strongly to the same base defines > that force them to stay in sync. > > Can we drop this patch? Or at least keep the users of the H_ and R_ > defines and set them to the same thing in map.h? > > I did that based on the suggestion from Michael Ellerman. I guess he wanted the VMALLOC_START to match. I am not sure whether we should match the kernel_region_map_size too. I did mention that in the cover letter. I agree with your suggestion above. I still can keep the VMALLOC_START at 16TB and keep the region_map_size as 512TB for radix 4k. I am not sure we want to do that. I will wait for feedback from Michael to make the suggested changes. -aneesh