From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [64.233.184.224] (helo=wr-out-0506.google.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IdVdY-0005ML-Cm for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 04 Oct 2007 20:41:31 +0200 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id c46so220436wra for ; Thu, 04 Oct 2007 11:36:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.222.21 with SMTP id u21mr994993wfg.1191522967152; Thu, 04 Oct 2007 11:36:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.81.6 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Oct 2007 11:36:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 11:36:07 -0700 From: "Chris Larson" Sender: kergoth@gmail.com To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org In-Reply-To: <4704EAE3.8050702@klever.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1191494488.2516.34.camel@toontown> <4704CC05.40206@klever.net> <1191502502.2516.39.camel@toontown> <4704EAE3.8050702@klever.net> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 91a7f270977a7c8f Subject: Re: monotone/git (was hello...) X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 18:41:33 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On 10/4/07, Michael Krelin wrote: > > Well luckily I am not an ignorant git-fanboy :) Could you shortly point > > out to me the reasons why you think monotone is favorable over git for > > use with openembedded ? I will admit right away that my limitation with > > SCMs in large projects is more than limited. So i can only speak of > > my user experience with git vs my experience with monotone and i prefer > > the first. > > Well, 1st - OE folks are used to monotone now. That's primary reason. > The second primary reason is that I know of some developers who seem to > dislike git. And if we're talking about technical reason, one I can > think of is that there's no non-ssh transport allowing push, which > complicates administration of our "central" repository. That's not correct. You can push to a git repository over http/webdav to an apache2 server. -- Chris Larson - clarson at kergoth dot com Dedicated Engineer - MontaVista - clarson at mvista dot com Core Developer/Architect - TSLib, BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus