From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> To: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] btrfs: update the bdev time directly when closing Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 08:35:40 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <b72b608c-4dec-3d46-3d35-816bcd87203f@oracle.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <7a02499fac5a53031b333ce58d84089c8ce9e329.1627419595.git.josef@toxicpanda.com> On 28/07/2021 05:01, Josef Bacik wrote: > We update the ctime/mtime of a block device when we remove it so that > blkid knows the device changed. However we do this by re-opening the > block device and calling filp_update_time. This is more correct because > it'll call the inode->i_op->update_time if it exists, but the block dev > inodes do not do this. Instead call generic_update_time() on the > bd_inode in order to avoid the blkdev_open path and get rid of the > following lockdep splat > > ====================================================== > WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected > 5.14.0-rc2+ #406 Not tainted > ------------------------------------------------------ > losetup/11596 is trying to acquire lock: > ffff939640d2f538 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0 > > but task is already holding lock: > ffff939655510c68 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x660 [loop] > > which lock already depends on the new lock. > > the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: > > -> #4 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: > __mutex_lock+0x7d/0x750 > lo_open+0x28/0x60 [loop] > blkdev_get_whole+0x25/0xf0 > blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x168/0x3c0 > blkdev_open+0xd2/0xe0 > do_dentry_open+0x161/0x390 > path_openat+0x3cc/0xa20 > do_filp_open+0x96/0x120 > do_sys_openat2+0x7b/0x130 > __x64_sys_openat+0x46/0x70 > do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae > > -> #3 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: > __mutex_lock+0x7d/0x750 > blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x56/0x3c0 > blkdev_open+0xd2/0xe0 > do_dentry_open+0x161/0x390 > path_openat+0x3cc/0xa20 > do_filp_open+0x96/0x120 > file_open_name+0xc7/0x170 > filp_open+0x2c/0x50 > btrfs_scratch_superblocks.part.0+0x10f/0x170 > btrfs_rm_device.cold+0xe8/0xed > btrfs_ioctl+0x2a31/0x2e70 > __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0 > do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae > > -> #2 (sb_writers#12){.+.+}-{0:0}: > lo_write_bvec+0xc2/0x240 [loop] > loop_process_work+0x238/0xd00 [loop] > process_one_work+0x26b/0x560 > worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 > kthread+0x140/0x160 > ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 > > -> #1 ((work_completion)(&lo->rootcg_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: > process_one_work+0x245/0x560 > worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 > kthread+0x140/0x160 > ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 > > -> #0 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}: > __lock_acquire+0x10ea/0x1d90 > lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0 > flush_workqueue+0x91/0x5e0 > drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110 > destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250 > __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x660 [loop] > block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50 > __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0 > do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae > > other info that might help us debug this: > > Chain exists of: > (wq_completion)loop0 --> &disk->open_mutex --> &lo->lo_mutex > > Possible unsafe locking scenario: > > CPU0 CPU1 > ---- ---- > lock(&lo->lo_mutex); > lock(&disk->open_mutex); > lock(&lo->lo_mutex); > lock((wq_completion)loop0); > > *** DEADLOCK *** > > 1 lock held by losetup/11596: > #0: ffff939655510c68 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x660 [loop] > > stack backtrace: > CPU: 1 PID: 11596 Comm: losetup Not tainted 5.14.0-rc2+ #406 > Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 > Call Trace: > dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72 > check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0 > ? stack_trace_save+0x3b/0x50 > __lock_acquire+0x10ea/0x1d90 > lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0 > ? flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0 > ? lockdep_init_map_type+0x47/0x220 > flush_workqueue+0x91/0x5e0 > ? flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0 > ? verify_cpu+0xf0/0x100 > drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110 > destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250 > __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x660 [loop] > ? blkdev_ioctl+0x8d/0x2a0 > block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50 > __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0 > do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae > > Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> > --- > fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 18 ++++++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c > index bf2449cdb2ab..3ab6c78e6eb2 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c > @@ -1882,15 +1882,17 @@ static int btrfs_add_dev_item(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, > * Function to update ctime/mtime for a given device path. > * Mainly used for ctime/mtime based probe like libblkid. > */ > -static void update_dev_time(const char *path_name) > +static void update_dev_time(struct block_device *bdev) > { > - struct file *filp; > + struct inode *inode = bdev->bd_inode; > + struct timespec64 now; > > - filp = filp_open(path_name, O_RDWR, 0); > - if (IS_ERR(filp)) > + /* Shouldn't happen but just in case. */ > + if (!inode) > return; > - file_update_time(filp); > - filp_close(filp, NULL); > + > + now = current_time(inode); > + generic_update_time(inode, &now, S_MTIME|S_CTIME); Oh. We could use that. > } > > static int btrfs_rm_dev_item(struct btrfs_device *device) > @@ -2070,7 +2072,7 @@ void btrfs_scratch_superblocks(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, > btrfs_kobject_uevent(bdev, KOBJ_CHANGE); > > /* Update ctime/mtime for device path for libblkid */ > - update_dev_time(device_path); > + update_dev_time(bdev); > } > > int btrfs_rm_device(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, const char *device_path, > @@ -2711,7 +2713,7 @@ int btrfs_init_new_device(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, const char *device_path > btrfs_forget_devices(device_path); > > /* Update ctime/mtime for blkid or udev */ > - update_dev_time(device_path); > + update_dev_time(bdev); > > return ret; > > Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-25 0:35 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-07-27 21:01 [PATCH v2 0/7] Josef Bacik 2021-07-27 21:01 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] btrfs: do not call close_fs_devices in btrfs_rm_device Josef Bacik 2021-09-01 8:13 ` Anand Jain 2021-07-27 21:01 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] btrfs: do not take the uuid_mutex " Josef Bacik 2021-09-01 12:01 ` Anand Jain 2021-09-01 17:08 ` David Sterba 2021-09-01 17:10 ` Josef Bacik 2021-09-01 19:49 ` Anand Jain 2021-09-02 12:58 ` David Sterba 2021-09-02 14:10 ` Josef Bacik 2021-09-17 14:33 ` David Sterba 2021-09-20 7:45 ` Anand Jain 2021-09-20 8:26 ` David Sterba 2021-09-20 9:41 ` Anand Jain 2021-09-23 4:33 ` Anand Jain 2021-09-21 11:59 ` Filipe Manana 2021-09-21 12:17 ` Filipe Manana 2021-09-22 15:33 ` Filipe Manana 2021-09-23 4:15 ` Anand Jain 2021-09-23 3:58 ` [PATCH] btrfs: drop lockdep assert in close_fs_devices() Anand Jain 2021-09-23 4:04 ` Anand Jain 2021-07-27 21:01 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] btrfs: do not read super look for a device path Josef Bacik 2021-08-25 2:00 ` Anand Jain 2021-09-27 15:32 ` Josef Bacik 2021-09-28 11:50 ` Anand Jain 2021-07-27 21:01 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] btrfs: update the bdev time directly when closing Josef Bacik 2021-08-25 0:35 ` Anand Jain [this message] 2021-09-02 12:16 ` David Sterba 2021-07-27 21:01 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] btrfs: delay blkdev_put until after the device remove Josef Bacik 2021-08-25 1:00 ` Anand Jain 2021-09-02 12:16 ` David Sterba 2021-07-27 21:01 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] btrfs: unify common code for the v1 and v2 versions of " Josef Bacik 2021-08-25 1:19 ` Anand Jain 2021-09-01 14:05 ` Nikolay Borisov 2021-07-27 21:01 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] btrfs: do not take the device_list_mutex in clone_fs_devices Josef Bacik 2021-08-24 22:08 ` Anand Jain 2021-09-01 13:35 ` Nikolay Borisov 2021-09-02 12:59 ` David Sterba 2021-09-17 15:06 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] David Sterba
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=b72b608c-4dec-3d46-3d35-816bcd87203f@oracle.com \ --to=anand.jain@oracle.com \ --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \ --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \ --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \ --subject='Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] btrfs: update the bdev time directly when closing' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.