From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ferruh Yigit Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] ethdev: check Rx/Tx offloads Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 16:59:52 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1524657013-40960-1-git-send-email-wei.dai@intel.com> <1524753466-17021-1-git-send-email-wei.dai@intel.com> <199f655c-1327-326b-c1b1-5e4fbefc6ae2@intel.com> <23128668.avUdXH7fuH@xps> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Wei Dai , qi.z.zhang@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org To: Thomas Monjalon Return-path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D56027D0E for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 17:59:56 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <23128668.avUdXH7fuH@xps> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 4/26/2018 4:56 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 26/04/2018 17:50, Ferruh Yigit: >> Lets add one more check and consider this for rc1, later we can update checks >> for suggested API in rc2. > > I don't think checks are required for RC1. > Can we take time to properly settle it in RC2? That is OK, I am always having a hesitation about the target of this patch, if it is trying to implement existing one or suggested one, that is the reason. Let me update my comment for suggested API change.