From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Vincent JARDIN <vincent.jardin@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] maintainers: claim responsability for xen
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 22:51:44 +0100
Message-ID: <b770194a-e4de-0aca-e41e-2aa49e1c1b4c@6wind.com>
References: <1478504326-68105-1-git-send-email-jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
 <CACJDEmqC7T5O=zF6SOsmfOizRXYM+e7nmbY=2VA4aJ13tkAS-w@mail.gmail.com>
 <83319780-26e9-afb6-74cd-20c07dad04a7@intel.com> <1915354.hxpEe7tUeI@xps13>
 <20170216133657.GB14695@dhcp-whq-twvpn-1-vpnpool-10-159-157-38.vpn.oracle.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: "Tan, Jianfeng" <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>,
 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@kernel.org>, dev@dpdk.org,
 bruce.richardson@intel.com, yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com,
 Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
 Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-wm0-f53.google.com (mail-wm0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 733129E7
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 22:51:48 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-wm0-f53.google.com with SMTP id t18so6085075wmt.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 13:51:48 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20170216133657.GB14695@dhcp-whq-twvpn-1-vpnpool-10-159-157-38.vpn.oracle.com>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Le 16/02/2017 à 14:36, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk a écrit :
>> Is it time now to officially remove Dom0 support?
> So we do have an prototype implementation of netback but it is waiting
> for review of xen-devel to the spec.
>
> And I believe the implementation does utilize some of the dom0
> parts of code in DPDK.

Please, do you have URLs/pointers about it? It would be interesting to 
share it with DPDK community too.

Best regards,
   Vincent