All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Unshare the idle-barrier from other kernel requests
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 14:19:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b7d250f9-5ead-9b5c-a388-61e1bfd0ae0e@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190725093810.19159-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>


On 25/07/2019 10:38, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Under some circumstances (see intel_context_prepare_remote_request), we
> may use a request along a kernel context to modify the logical state of
> another. To keep the target context in place while the request executes,
> we take an active reference on it using the kernel timeline. This is the
> same timeline as we use for the idle-barrier, and so we end up reusing
> the same active node. Except that the idle barrier is special and cannot
> be reused in this manner! Give the idle-barrier a reserved timeline
> index (0) so that it will always be unique (give or take we may issue
> multiple idle barriers across multiple engines).
> 
> Reported-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
> Fixes: ce476c80b8bf ("drm/i915: Keep contexts pinned until after the next kernel context switch")
> Fixes: a9877da2d629 ("drm/i915/oa: Reconfigure contexts on the fly")
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c       |  42 ++-
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.h       |  13 +-
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_context.c    | 321 ++++++++++++++++++
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c            |  67 +++-
>   .../drm/i915/selftests/i915_live_selftests.h  |   3 +-
>   5 files changed, 408 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>   create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_context.c
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c
> index 9292b6ca5e9c..bc20161bab9f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c
> @@ -162,18 +162,8 @@ static int __intel_context_active(struct i915_active *active)
>   	if (err)
>   		goto err_ring;
>   
> -	/* Preallocate tracking nodes */
> -	if (!i915_gem_context_is_kernel(ce->gem_context)) {
> -		err = i915_active_acquire_preallocate_barrier(&ce->active,
> -							      ce->engine);
> -		if (err)
> -			goto err_state;
> -	}
> -
>   	return 0;
>   
> -err_state:
> -	__context_unpin_state(ce->state);
>   err_ring:
>   	intel_ring_unpin(ce->ring);
>   err_put:
> @@ -181,6 +171,34 @@ static int __intel_context_active(struct i915_active *active)
>   	return err;
>   }
>   
> +int intel_context_active_acquire(struct intel_context *ce)
> +{
> +	int err;
> +
> +	err = i915_active_acquire(&ce->active);
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;
> +
> +	/* Preallocate tracking nodes */
> +	if (ce->state && !i915_gem_context_is_kernel(ce->gem_context)) {
> +		err = i915_active_acquire_preallocate_barrier(&ce->active,
> +							      ce->engine);
> +		if (err) {
> +			i915_active_release(&ce->active);
> +			return err;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +void intel_context_active_release(struct intel_context *ce)
> +{
> +	/* Nodes preallocated in intel_context_active() */
> +	i915_active_acquire_barrier(&ce->active);
> +	i915_active_release(&ce->active);
> +}
> +
>   void
>   intel_context_init(struct intel_context *ce,
>   		   struct i915_gem_context *ctx,
> @@ -284,3 +302,7 @@ struct i915_request *intel_context_create_request(struct intel_context *ce)
>   
>   	return rq;
>   }
> +
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_SELFTEST)
> +#include "selftest_context.c"
> +#endif
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.h
> index 23c7e4c0ce7c..07f9924de48f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.h
> @@ -104,17 +104,8 @@ static inline void intel_context_exit(struct intel_context *ce)
>   		ce->ops->exit(ce);
>   }
>   
> -static inline int intel_context_active_acquire(struct intel_context *ce)
> -{
> -	return i915_active_acquire(&ce->active);
> -}
> -
> -static inline void intel_context_active_release(struct intel_context *ce)
> -{
> -	/* Nodes preallocated in intel_context_active() */
> -	i915_active_acquire_barrier(&ce->active);
> -	i915_active_release(&ce->active);
> -}
> +int intel_context_active_acquire(struct intel_context *ce);
> +void intel_context_active_release(struct intel_context *ce);
>   
>   static inline struct intel_context *intel_context_get(struct intel_context *ce)
>   {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_context.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_context.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..4d251faafcc0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_context.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,321 @@
> +/*
> + * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> + *
> + * Copyright © 2019 Intel Corporation
> + */
> +
> +#include "i915_selftest.h"
> +#include "intel_gt.h"
> +
> +#include "gem/selftests/mock_context.h"
> +#include "selftests/igt_flush_test.h"
> +#include "selftests/mock_drm.h"
> +
> +static int request_sync(struct i915_request *rq)
> +{
> +	long timeout;
> +	int err = 0;
> +
> +	i915_request_get(rq);
> +
> +	i915_request_add(rq);
> +	timeout = i915_request_wait(rq, 0, HZ / 10);
> +	if (timeout < 0)
> +		err = timeout;
> +	else
> +		i915_request_retire_upto(rq);
> +
> +	i915_request_put(rq);
> +
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
> +static int context_sync(struct intel_context *ce)
> +{
> +	struct intel_timeline *tl = ce->ring->timeline;
> +	int err = 0;
> +
> +	do {
> +		struct i915_request *rq;
> +		long timeout;
> +
> +		rcu_read_lock();
> +		rq = rcu_dereference(tl->last_request.request);
> +		if (rq)
> +			rq = i915_request_get_rcu(rq);
> +		rcu_read_unlock();
> +		if (!rq)
> +			break;
> +
> +		timeout = i915_request_wait(rq, 0, HZ / 10);
> +		if (timeout < 0)
> +			err = timeout;
> +		else
> +			i915_request_retire_upto(rq);
> +
> +		i915_request_put(rq);
> +	} while (!err);
> +
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
> +static int __live_active_context(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> +				 struct i915_gem_context *fixme)
> +{
> +	struct intel_context *ce;
> +	int pass;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * We keep active contexts alive until after a subsequent context
> +	 * switch as the final write from the context-save will be after
> +	 * we retire the final request. We track when we unpin the context,
> +	 * under the presumption that the final pin is from the last request,
> +	 * and instead of immediately unpinning the context, we add a task
> +	 * to unpin the context from the next idle-barrier.
> +	 *
> +	 * This test makes sure that the context is kept alive until a
> +	 * subsequent idle-barrier (emitted when the engine wakeref hits 0
> +	 * with no more outstanding requests).
> +	 */
> +
> +	if (intel_engine_pm_is_awake(engine)) {
> +		pr_err("%s is awake before starting %s!\n",
> +		       engine->name, __func__);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	ce = intel_context_create(fixme, engine);
> +	if (!ce)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	for (pass = 0; pass <= 2; pass++) {
> +		struct i915_request *rq;
> +
> +		rq = intel_context_create_request(ce);
> +		if (IS_ERR(rq)) {
> +			err = PTR_ERR(rq);
> +			goto err;
> +		}
> +
> +		err = request_sync(rq);
> +		if (err)
> +			goto err;
> +
> +		/* Context will be kept active until after an idle-barrier. */
> +		if (i915_active_is_idle(&ce->active)) {
> +			pr_err("context is not active; expected idle-barrier (pass %d)\n", pass);
> +			err = -EINVAL;
> +			goto err;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (!intel_engine_pm_is_awake(engine)) {
> +			pr_err("%s is asleep before idle-barrier %s!\n",
> +			       engine->name, __func__);
> +			err = -EINVAL;
> +			goto err;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Now make sure our idle-barriers are flushed */
> +	err = context_sync(engine->kernel_context);
> +	if (err)
> +		goto err;
> +
> +	if (!i915_active_is_idle(&ce->active)) {
> +		pr_err("context is still active!");
> +		err = -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (intel_engine_pm_is_awake(engine)) {
> +		struct drm_printer p = drm_debug_printer(__func__);
> +
> +		intel_engine_dump(engine, &p,
> +				  "%s is still awake after idle-barriers\n",
> +				  engine->name);
> +		GEM_TRACE_DUMP();
> +
> +		err = -EINVAL;
> +		goto err;
> +	}
> +
> +err:
> +	intel_context_put(ce);
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
> +static int live_active_context(void *arg)
> +{
> +	struct intel_gt *gt = arg;
> +	struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
> +	struct i915_gem_context *fixme;
> +	enum intel_engine_id id;
> +	struct drm_file *file;
> +	int err = 0;
> +
> +	file = mock_file(gt->i915);
> +	if (IS_ERR(file))
> +		return PTR_ERR(file);
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&gt->i915->drm.struct_mutex);
> +
> +	fixme = live_context(gt->i915, file);
> +	if (!fixme) {
> +		err = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto unlock;
> +	}
> +
> +	for_each_engine(engine, gt->i915, id) {
> +		err = __live_active_context(engine, fixme);
> +		if (err)
> +			break;
> +
> +		err = igt_flush_test(gt->i915, I915_WAIT_LOCKED);
> +		if (err)
> +			break;
> +	}
> +
> +unlock:
> +	mutex_unlock(&gt->i915->drm.struct_mutex);
> +	mock_file_free(gt->i915, file);
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
> +static int __live_remote_context(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> +				 struct i915_gem_context *fixme)
> +{
> +	struct intel_context *local, *remote;
> +	struct i915_request *rq;
> +	int pass;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Check that our idle barriers do not interfere with normal
> +	 * activity tracking. In particular, check that operating
> +	 * on the context image remotely (intel_context_prepare_remote_request)
> +	 * which inserts foriegn fences into intel_context.active are not
> +	 * clobbered.
> +	 */
> +
> +	remote = intel_context_create(fixme, engine);
> +	if (!remote)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	local = intel_context_create(fixme, engine);
> +	if (!local) {
> +		err = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto err_remote;
> +	}
> +
> +	for (pass = 0; pass <= 2; pass++) {
> +		err = intel_context_pin(remote);
> +		if (err)
> +			goto err_local;
> +
> +		rq = intel_context_create_request(local);
> +		if (IS_ERR(rq)) {
> +			err = PTR_ERR(rq);
> +			goto err_unpin;
> +		}
> +
> +		err = intel_context_prepare_remote_request(remote, rq);
> +		if (err) {
> +			i915_request_add(rq);
> +			goto err_unpin;
> +		}
> +
> +		err = request_sync(rq);
> +		if (err)
> +			goto err_unpin;
> +
> +		intel_context_unpin(remote);
> +		err = intel_context_pin(remote);
> +		if (err)
> +			goto err_local;
> +
> +		rq = i915_request_create(engine->kernel_context);
> +		if (IS_ERR(rq)) {
> +			err = PTR_ERR(rq);
> +			goto err_unpin;
> +		}
> +
> +		err = intel_context_prepare_remote_request(remote, rq);
> +		if (err) {
> +			i915_request_add(rq);
> +			goto err_unpin;
> +		}
> +
> +		err = request_sync(rq);
> +		if (err)
> +			goto err_unpin;
> +
> +		intel_context_unpin(remote);
> +
> +		if (i915_active_is_idle(&remote->active)) {
> +			pr_err("remote context is not active; expected idle-barrier (pass %d)\n", pass);
> +			err = -EINVAL;
> +			goto err_local;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	goto err_local;
> +
> +err_unpin:
> +	intel_context_unpin(remote);
> +err_local:
> +	intel_context_put(local);
> +err_remote:
> +	intel_context_put(remote);
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
> +static int live_remote_context(void *arg)
> +{
> +	struct intel_gt *gt = arg;
> +	struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
> +	struct i915_gem_context *fixme;
> +	enum intel_engine_id id;
> +	struct drm_file *file;
> +	int err = 0;
> +
> +	file = mock_file(gt->i915);
> +	if (IS_ERR(file))
> +		return PTR_ERR(file);
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&gt->i915->drm.struct_mutex);
> +
> +	fixme = live_context(gt->i915, file);
> +	if (!fixme) {
> +		err = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto unlock;
> +	}
> +
> +	for_each_engine(engine, gt->i915, id) {
> +		err = __live_remote_context(engine, fixme);
> +		if (err)
> +			break;
> +
> +		err = igt_flush_test(gt->i915, I915_WAIT_LOCKED);
> +		if (err)
> +			break;
> +	}
> +
> +unlock:
> +	mutex_unlock(&gt->i915->drm.struct_mutex);
> +	mock_file_free(gt->i915, file);
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
> +int intel_context_live_selftests(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> +{
> +	static const struct i915_subtest tests[] = {
> +		SUBTEST(live_active_context),
> +		SUBTEST(live_remote_context),
> +	};
> +	struct intel_gt *gt = &i915->gt;
> +
> +	if (intel_gt_is_wedged(gt))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	return intel_gt_live_subtests(tests, gt);
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> index 13f304a29fc8..e04afb519264 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> @@ -184,6 +184,7 @@ active_instance(struct i915_active *ref, u64 idx)
>   	ref->cache = node;
>   	mutex_unlock(&ref->mutex);
>   
> +	BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(typeof(*node), base));
>   	return &node->base;
>   }
>   
> @@ -212,6 +213,8 @@ int i915_active_ref(struct i915_active *ref,
>   	struct i915_active_request *active;
>   	int err;
>   
> +	GEM_BUG_ON(!timeline); /* reserved for idle-barrier */
> +
>   	/* Prevent reaping in case we malloc/wait while building the tree */
>   	err = i915_active_acquire(ref);
>   	if (err)
> @@ -222,6 +225,7 @@ int i915_active_ref(struct i915_active *ref,
>   		err = -ENOMEM;
>   		goto out;
>   	}
> +	GEM_BUG_ON(IS_ERR(active->request));
>   
>   	if (!i915_active_request_isset(active))
>   		atomic_inc(&ref->count);
> @@ -342,6 +346,34 @@ void i915_active_fini(struct i915_active *ref)
>   }
>   #endif
>   
> +static struct active_node *idle_barrier(struct i915_active *ref)
> +{
> +	struct active_node *idle = NULL;
> +	struct rb_node *rb;
> +
> +	if (RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&ref->tree))
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&ref->mutex);
> +	for (rb = rb_first(&ref->tree); rb; rb = rb_next(rb)) {
> +		struct active_node *node;
> +
> +		node = rb_entry(rb, typeof(*node), node);
> +		if (node->timeline)
> +			break;

I think the code needs to be more explicit for readability. Special 
timeline value zero at least as a #define. Plus some comments.

> +
> +		if (!i915_active_request_isset(&node->base)) {
> +			GEM_BUG_ON(!list_empty(&node->base.link));
> +			rb_erase(rb, &ref->tree);
> +			idle = node;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	mutex_unlock(&ref->mutex);
> +
> +	return idle;
> +}
> +
>   int i915_active_acquire_preallocate_barrier(struct i915_active *ref,
>   					    struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>   {
> @@ -352,22 +384,29 @@ int i915_active_acquire_preallocate_barrier(struct i915_active *ref,
>   
>   	GEM_BUG_ON(!engine->mask);
>   	for_each_engine_masked(engine, i915, engine->mask, tmp) {
> -		struct intel_context *kctx = engine->kernel_context;
>   		struct active_node *node;
>   
> -		node = kmem_cache_alloc(global.slab_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
> -		if (unlikely(!node)) {
> -			err = -ENOMEM;
> -			goto unwind;
> +		node = idle_barrier(ref);
> +		if (!node) {
> +			node = kmem_cache_alloc(global.slab_cache,
> +						GFP_KERNEL |
> +						__GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL |
> +						__GFP_NOWARN);
> +			if (unlikely(!node)) {
> +				err = -ENOMEM;
> +				goto unwind;
> +			}
> +
> +			node->ref = ref;
> +			node->timeline = 0;
> +			node->base.retire = node_retire;
>   		}
>   
> -		i915_active_request_init(&node->base,
> -					 (void *)engine, node_retire);
> -		node->timeline = kctx->ring->timeline->fence_context;
> -		node->ref = ref;
> +		intel_engine_pm_get(engine);

AFAIU this could comfortably be moved last instead of going even higher 
with this patch.

> +
> +		RCU_INIT_POINTER(node->base.request, (void *)engine);

What happens with the engine in request slot? Nothing if there is no 
retire hook set? But who uses it then?

>   		atomic_inc(&ref->count);
>   
> -		intel_engine_pm_get(engine);
>   		llist_add((struct llist_node *)&node->base.link,
>   			  &ref->barriers);
>   	}
> @@ -402,6 +441,7 @@ void i915_active_acquire_barrier(struct i915_active *ref)
>   
>   		node = container_of((struct list_head *)pos,
>   				    typeof(*node), base.link);
> +		GEM_BUG_ON(node->timeline);
>   
>   		engine = (void *)rcu_access_pointer(node->base.request);
>   		RCU_INIT_POINTER(node->base.request, ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN));
> @@ -410,12 +450,7 @@ void i915_active_acquire_barrier(struct i915_active *ref)
>   		p = &ref->tree.rb_node;
>   		while (*p) {
>   			parent = *p;
> -			if (rb_entry(parent,
> -				     struct active_node,
> -				     node)->timeline < node->timeline)
> -				p = &parent->rb_right;
> -			else
> -				p = &parent->rb_left;
> +			p = &parent->rb_left;

I don't get this hunk at all - how can it be okay to ignore the timeline 
value. Is this the buggy bit you mentioned on IRC?

First pass, I'll come back later.

Regards,

Tvrtko

>   		}
>   		rb_link_node(&node->node, parent, p);
>   		rb_insert_color(&node->node, &ref->tree);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_live_selftests.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_live_selftests.h
> index 2b31a4ee0b4c..a841d3f9bedc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_live_selftests.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_live_selftests.h
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ selftest(workarounds, intel_workarounds_live_selftests)
>   selftest(timelines, intel_timeline_live_selftests)
>   selftest(requests, i915_request_live_selftests)
>   selftest(active, i915_active_live_selftests)
> +selftest(gt_contexts, intel_context_live_selftests)
>   selftest(objects, i915_gem_object_live_selftests)
>   selftest(mman, i915_gem_mman_live_selftests)
>   selftest(dmabuf, i915_gem_dmabuf_live_selftests)
> @@ -24,7 +25,7 @@ selftest(gtt, i915_gem_gtt_live_selftests)
>   selftest(gem, i915_gem_live_selftests)
>   selftest(evict, i915_gem_evict_live_selftests)
>   selftest(hugepages, i915_gem_huge_page_live_selftests)
> -selftest(contexts, i915_gem_context_live_selftests)
> +selftest(gem_contexts, i915_gem_context_live_selftests)
>   selftest(blt, i915_gem_object_blt_live_selftests)
>   selftest(client, i915_gem_client_blt_live_selftests)
>   selftest(reset, intel_reset_live_selftests)
> 
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-07-25 13:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-25  7:43 [PATCH] drm/i915: Unshare the idle-barrier from other kernel requests Chris Wilson
2019-07-25  8:26 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Unshare the idle-barrier from other kernel requests (rev3) Patchwork
2019-07-25  9:12 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2019-07-25  9:38 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Unshare the idle-barrier from other kernel requests Chris Wilson
2019-07-25 10:26   ` Lionel Landwerlin
2019-07-25 13:19   ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2019-07-25 13:26     ` Chris Wilson
2019-07-25 11:23 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Unshare the idle-barrier from other kernel requests (rev4) Patchwork
2019-07-25 11:44 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-07-25 11:48   ` Chris Wilson
2019-07-25 17:53 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-07-24 12:43 [PATCH] drm/i915: Unshare the idle-barrier from other kernel requests Chris Wilson
2019-07-24 12:50 ` Chris Wilson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b7d250f9-5ead-9b5c-a388-61e1bfd0ae0e@linux.intel.com \
    --to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.