From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758709Ab0FBUpF (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jun 2010 16:45:05 -0400 Received: from usul.saidi.cx ([204.11.33.34]:52842 "EHLO usul.overt.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758027Ab0FBUpD (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jun 2010 16:45:03 -0400 To: Maxim Levitsky Subject: Re: strange problem with ricoh-mmc MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 16:42:33 -0400 From: Philip Langdale Cc: linux-kernel In-Reply-To: <1275509965.6277.5.camel@maxim-laptop> References: <1275505018.4215.10.camel@maxim-laptop> <04b98a3f757587ee9b72f2e28e257b50@localhost> <1275509965.6277.5.camel@maxim-laptop> Message-ID: User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 02 Jun 2010 23:19:25 +0300, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > Thanks. > I some future I maybe consider reverse engineering the MMC controller. Someone actually did, if you dig back through the SDHCI mailing list. It's apparently almost identical to SDHCI with the Cap flags not set properly. http://list.drzeus.cx/pipermail/sdhci-devel/2007-December/002085.html Still, even if we got it working properly, it would be rather less elegant than what we have today, modulo hardware freaking out as you are experiencing... --phil