From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CADE1C433E0 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 03:15:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B31A64FEE for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 03:15:25 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3B31A64FEE Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DsCXq4f9rz3d35 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 14:15:23 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=MpCtC69K; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=jrey@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=MpCtC69K; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DsCXH5W5tz3cHr for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 14:14:54 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098413.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 1253349S106417 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 22:14:50 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : subject : to : message-id : date : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=qipRl1pGR7GZH5scNl9pCeQGeKYfMfblerzY/rqeahE=; b=MpCtC69KmIVjRSf+v9unWdVy1uBNceMlF9CYNe20osBErMhhTn7j+49Iu52Pj7/QtpLE xjxW4CClNpASImobVmwEqLeMv6MrixWWiLMMrJXkrcTfzrkUBfRF7d37w0U9s3Oq38na BYwXffrcej2EDPmqS/d9RNmXyaby1rKCWawySFmdam5BKcXZKuQ6zJu1rJBdLrn8coM7 +zr7aXS2o6G/c95F813AhnLIp6rj9UAyob0gKlpgEfreJrSBRaPrVZhY8vKxg/vwJ9XP u0/OrS7MwCXOW6ESwmaixSMOjvOsuhHGoF2uNcX4IUMxIC7sVaZPTgo8O0/fElgHC00h gQ== Received: from ppma01dal.us.ibm.com (83.d6.3fa9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.63.214.131]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 373a2c3bd0-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 22:14:50 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma01dal.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma01dal.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 1253727H019445 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 03:14:50 GMT Received: from b03cxnp07029.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp07029.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.16]) by ppma01dal.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 371qmv1ved-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 03:14:49 +0000 Received: from b03ledav005.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav005.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.236]) by b03cxnp07029.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 1253EmNP46268906 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 03:14:48 GMT Received: from b03ledav005.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6233BE051 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 03:14:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b03ledav005.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73097BE04F for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 03:14:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from demeter.local (unknown [9.160.7.87]) by b03ledav005.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 03:14:48 +0000 (GMT) From: Joseph Reynolds Subject: Request new repo for IBM-specific code To: openbmc Message-ID: Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 21:14:47 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.16; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.369, 18.0.761 definitions=2021-03-04_09:2021-03-03, 2021-03-04 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxlogscore=918 lowpriorityscore=1 clxscore=1015 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 bulkscore=1 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2103050013 X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "openbmc" What is the right repository for a new Linux-PAM module to implement an IBM-specific ACF authentication? The access control file (ACF) design was introduced to the OpenBMC security working group and is described in [IBM issue 1737][] and further explained in [IBM issue 2562][]. Note the [pam-ipmi modules][] are scoped to the OpenBMC project because the IPMI implementation is shared by all of OpenBMC.  By comparison, the proposed ibm-pam-acf module is intended only for IBM Enterprise systems.  The intended implementation is based on standard cryptography techniques and could be developed into a general authentication solution, but the ACF is specific to IBM in terms of its exact format and content, and I expect it will only be used by IBM and its partners. Can we create a new OpenBMC repo for this?  Perhaps ibm-pam-acf?  Or should this go into some other repo? - Joseph [IBM issue 1737]: https://github.com/ibm-openbmc/dev/issues/1737 [IBM issue 2562]: https://github.com/ibm-openbmc/dev/issues/2562 [pam-ipmi modules]: https://github.com/openbmc/pam-ipmi