From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5B92C433F5 for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 13:35:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6827E610E8 for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 13:35:37 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 6827E610E8 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:54632 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mSfvs-0000M8-IP for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 09:35:36 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57078) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mSfqy-0004XR-Su for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 09:30:33 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x429.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::429]:42953) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mSfqw-0002wF-5P for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 09:30:32 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-x429.google.com with SMTP id q23so17371534pfs.9 for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 06:30:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qDLicoDmIhGKlLMsZXsYI4vzoHN5hXvnOncXZe20ywc=; b=UWr+Iwjly5NtO3RZsbuPr2na6TBFlFCJlXUv+WE6iZH1x8Mn8aQsQIYXL6C+g93Upn z2Y/ZYWd2v82ZLqo8gCaLIsvGSg8OMk1dz8SRScrE33DLFtObQoBDI/Ly4BB2in1d+ik cXM6jiO7hPWTsiPFh/WqR13LbzqPfDnF9/NcrJ4xmBDo+h1Fz+JcGNlYPqBz5M1l7f6z mY4OANyxe0tOc/ciUyo5eB2IG9VjscZrA7IzIOnVIKd5x/LxXECl7VA7X68cZ3obpuuW nNz5yJDiM3jXz5t/r31cgJTsCafrjzmkIklxv76jgnp9faFgczeeXOx9lVt0VGgrL1bW W56w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=qDLicoDmIhGKlLMsZXsYI4vzoHN5hXvnOncXZe20ywc=; b=2hgDiWtX1ilqpji/t6eRt4WvkM687FoiGqxPUKtjDzFtBCePPUH6mnwvV8Q5A3q7mC ZR0s4XUhBtikaQxWlBXboAjLVQkIeHaea4QTVRjVVacCzpXl+RuBoJCHHe5nj3Zdjymq xgX6w2Gy0gETjL4U1wTMXGFf6wMb8VWpJo1Z7fpuAd4ssy3qieHiiA+otFbXX7IesjsH ZJ0iCI1OqBs8SFi/x1xDdusX9komKTLLpDjZx3QCLpP7uGU49epGJN7npigzCiiORw0u u44dyNdZRshi1jcx6PTk8sIH+Bzm6rq/jh0SvmHadDfqFjMV7ymI8t2HkgurJygtidmE P3uw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530KseiWE/jiot928d+rvUlswU9cRY78fRWynl4vn4KXb94vtIvT FWE/yjbLXqOhT2HMXb6I19CHT1xz4S2iUw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzXkpFMx3oWUe3djwf6tROP6fCX9x2cWHnIXjQo75z9zHvvLNAoiIRvro066JbLwZZDCUTakw== X-Received: by 2002:a65:63d0:: with SMTP id n16mr28918838pgv.432.1632231028438; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 06:30:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.11] ([71.212.134.125]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v8sm2700809pjh.24.2021.09.21.06.30.27 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 21 Sep 2021 06:30:28 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 28/30] configure, meson.build: Mark support for 64-bit LoongArch hosts To: WANG Xuerui , qemu-devel@nongnu.org References: <20210920080451.408655-1-git@xen0n.name> <20210920080451.408655-29-git@xen0n.name> From: Richard Henderson Message-ID: Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 06:30:25 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::429; envelope-from=richard.henderson@linaro.org; helo=mail-pf1-x429.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 9/20/21 11:02 PM, WANG Xuerui wrote: > The loongarch32 tuple will most certainly come into existence some time in the future, but > probably bare-metal-only and without a Linux port AFAIK. Ok, I'll bear that in mind when considering target/loongarch/. > So should I drop the explicit probing for __loongarch64, instead just probe for > __loongarch__ and later #error out the non-__loongarch64 cases individually? I'm ok with checking the __loongarch64 define, but I thing ARCH=loongarch is sufficient. That name will apply to linux-user/host/$ARCH/ and tcg/$ARCH/. r~