From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: onelektra@gmx.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: initialize SMPS field in HT capabilities
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 09:54:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ba04d61c-3f80-573f-3108-c94a9c991404@nbd.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1484295655.19860.9.camel@sipsolutions.net>
On 2017-01-13 09:20, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-01-11 at 23:33 +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> ibss and mesh modes copy the ht capabilites from the band without
>> overriding the SMPS state. Unfortunately the default value 0 for the
>> SMPS field means static SMPS instead of disabled.
>>
>> This results in HT ibss and mesh setups using only single-stream
>> rates,
>> even though SMPS is not supposed to be active.
>>
>> Initialize SMPS to disabled for all bands on ieee80211_hw_register to
>> ensure that the value is sane where it is not overriden with the real
>> SMPS state.
>
> Hmm. I guess the only other place affected by it will be scanning?
Right.
>> Reported-by: Elektra Wagenrad <onelektra@gmx.net>
>> Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>
>> ---
>> net/mac80211/main.c | 13 +++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/mac80211/main.c b/net/mac80211/main.c
>> index 1822c77f2b1c..c269046aa02b 100644
>> --- a/net/mac80211/main.c
>> +++ b/net/mac80211/main.c
>> @@ -913,10 +913,15 @@ int ieee80211_register_hw(struct ieee80211_hw
>> *hw)
>> supp_ht = supp_ht || sband->ht_cap.ht_supported;
>> supp_vht = supp_vht || sband->vht_cap.vht_supported;
>>
>> - if (sband->ht_cap.ht_supported)
>> - local->rx_chains =
>> - max(ieee80211_mcs_to_chains(&sband-
>> >ht_cap.mcs),
>> - local->rx_chains);
>> + if (!sband->ht_cap.ht_supported)
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + local->rx_chains =
>> + max(ieee80211_mcs_to_chains(&sband-
>> >ht_cap.mcs),
>> + local->rx_chains);
>> +
>> + sband->ht_cap.cap |= WLAN_HT_CAP_SM_PS_DISABLED <<
>> + IEEE80211_HT_CAP_SM_PS_SHIFT;
>
> This ... looks fishy. I know it's not, since it sets both bits, but
> still.
>
> Additionally, ath10k appears to be setting this to
> WLAN_HT_CAP_SM_PS_DYNAMIC already, so apparently it's expecting
> something to happen with that value? Is it really correct then to be
> overwriting it?
Actually, that code seems to leave the value at
WLAN_HT_CAP_SM_PS_DISABLED, because it sets that first and doesn't mask
out the field before trying to set it to WLAN_HT_CAP_SM_PS_DYNAMIC.
I don't think it even makes sense to set WLAN_HT_CAP_SM_PS_DYNAMIC at
this point, since it's up to mac80211 to deal with the SMPS state.
Either way, WLAN_HT_CAP_SM_PS_STATIC is a really bad default to have at
init time. If you want, I can change the patch to check for that value
before changing it, but I don't really see the point.
Additionally, I found this ath10k commit:
commit e33a99e227e430a788467e5a85dc29f6df16b983
Author: Peter Oh <poh@qca.qualcomm.com>
Date: Thu Dec 31 15:26:20 2015 +0200
ath10k: set SM power save disabled to default value
Use SMPS disabled as default because FW does not indicate
any support of SMPS.
This change will help STAs out that don’t support SMPS from
sticking on 1SS, since they don’t have method to change it
back to multiple chains.
This change also should not affect power consumption of STAs
supporting SMPS, because they are capable to switch the mode
to dynamic or static either at the end of frame sequence or
by using SMPS action frame.
Signed-off-by: Peter Oh <poh@qca.qualcomm.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c
index b4bdeb07a012..6146a293601a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c
@@ -3860,7 +3860,8 @@ static struct ieee80211_sta_ht_cap ath10k_get_ht_cap(struct ath10k *ar)
ht_cap.ampdu_density = IEEE80211_HT_MPDU_DENSITY_8;
ht_cap.cap |= IEEE80211_HT_CAP_SUP_WIDTH_20_40;
ht_cap.cap |= IEEE80211_HT_CAP_DSSSCCK40;
- ht_cap.cap |= WLAN_HT_CAP_SM_PS_STATIC << IEEE80211_HT_CAP_SM_PS_SHIFT;
+ ht_cap.cap |=
+ WLAN_HT_CAP_SM_PS_DISABLED << IEEE80211_HT_CAP_SM_PS_SHIFT;
if (ar->ht_cap_info & WMI_HT_CAP_HT20_SGI)
ht_cap.cap |= IEEE80211_HT_CAP_SGI_20;
- Felix
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-13 8:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-11 22:33 [PATCH] mac80211: initialize SMPS field in HT capabilities Felix Fietkau
2017-01-13 8:20 ` Johannes Berg
2017-01-13 8:54 ` Felix Fietkau [this message]
2017-01-13 10:20 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ba04d61c-3f80-573f-3108-c94a9c991404@nbd.name \
--to=nbd@nbd.name \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=onelektra@gmx.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.