From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1753305AbdDLMZo (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Wed, 12 Apr 2017 08:25:44 -0400
Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:64306 "EHLO mga14.intel.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1751780AbdDLMZl (ORCPT <rfc822;Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 12 Apr 2017 08:25:41 -0400
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.37,190,1488873600"; 
   d="scan'208";a="1134418656"
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] perf report: Show branch type
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
        mingo@redhat.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
        Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com, kan.liang@intel.com,
        yao.jin@intel.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
References: <1491949266-6835-1-git-send-email-yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
 <20170412105839.GC14409@krava>
From: "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Message-ID: <baf0ed91-e69c-255b-10f0-a4d82efa78eb@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 20:25:34 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20170412105839.GC14409@krava>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org



On 4/12/2017 6:58 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 06:21:01AM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
>> 3. Use 2 bits in perf_branch_entry for a "cross" metrics checking
>>     for branch cross 4K or 2M area. It's an approximate computing
>>     for checking if the branch cross 4K page or 2MB page.
>>
>> For example:
>>
>> perf record -g --branch-filter any,save_type <command>
>>
>> perf report --stdio
>>
>>       JCC forward:  27.7%
>>      JCC backward:   9.8%
>>               JMP:   0.0%
>>           IND_JMP:   6.5%
>>              CALL:  26.6%
>>          IND_CALL:   0.0%
>>               RET:  29.3%
>>              IRET:   0.0%
>>          CROSS_4K:   0.0%
>>          CROSS_2M:  14.3%
> got mangled perf report --stdio output for:
>
>
> [root@ibm-x3650m4-02 perf]# ./perf record -j any,save_type kill
> kill: not enough arguments
> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.013 MB perf.data (18 samples) ]
>
> [root@ibm-x3650m4-02 perf]# ./perf report --stdio -f | head -30
> # To display the perf.data header info, please use --header/--header-only options.
> #
> #
> # Total Lost Samples: 0
> #
> # Samples: 253  of event 'cycles'
> # Event count (approx.): 253
> #
> # Overhead  Command  Source Shared Object  Source Symbol                            Target Symbol                            Basic Block Cycles
> # ........  .......  ....................  .......................................  .......................................  ..................
> #
>       8.30%  perf
> Um  [kernel.vmlinux]      [k] __intel_pmu_enable_all.constprop.17  [k] native_write_msr                     -
>       7.91%  perf
> Um  [kernel.vmlinux]      [k] intel_pmu_lbr_enable_all             [k] __intel_pmu_enable_all.constprop.17  -
>       7.91%  perf
> Um  [kernel.vmlinux]      [k] native_write_msr                     [k] intel_pmu_lbr_enable_all             -
>       6.32%  kill     libc-2.24.so          [.] _dl_addr                             [.] _dl_addr                             -
>       5.93%  perf
> Um  [kernel.vmlinux]      [k] perf_iterate_ctx                     [k] perf_iterate_ctx                     -
>       2.77%  kill     libc-2.24.so          [.] malloc                               [.] malloc                               -
>       1.98%  kill     libc-2.24.so          [.] _int_malloc                          [.] _int_malloc                          -
>       1.58%  kill     [kernel.vmlinux]      [k] __rb_insert_augmented                [k] __rb_insert_augmented                -
>       1.58%  perf
> Um  [kernel.vmlinux]      [k] perf_event_exec                      [k] perf_event_exec                      -
>       1.19%  kill     [kernel.vmlinux]      [k] anon_vma_interval_tree_insert        [k] anon_vma_interval_tree_insert        -
>       1.19%  kill     [kernel.vmlinux]      [k] free_pgd_range                       [k] free_pgd_range                       -
>       1.19%  kill     [kernel.vmlinux]      [k] n_tty_write                          [k] n_tty_write                          -
>       1.19%  perf
> Um  [kernel.vmlinux]      [k] native_sched_clock                   [k] sched_clock                          -
> ...
> SNIP
>
>
> jirka

Hi,

Thanks so much for trying this patch.

The branch statistics is printed at the end of perf report --stdio.

For example, on my machine,

root@skl:/tmp# perf record -j any,save_type kill
. . . . . .

For more details see kill(1).
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.011 MB perf.data (1 samples) ]

root@skl:/tmp# perf report --stdio
# To display the perf.data header info, please use 
--header/--header-only options.
#
#
# Total Lost Samples: 0
#
# Samples: 3  of event 'cycles'
# Event count (approx.): 3
#
# Overhead  Command  Source Shared Object  Source Symbol                 
Target Symbol                 Basic Block Cycles
# ........  .......  .................... ............................  
............................ ..................
#
     33.33%  perf     [kernel.vmlinux]      [k] 
__intel_pmu_enable_all    [k] native_write_msr          10
     33.33%  perf     [kernel.vmlinux]      [k] 
intel_pmu_lbr_enable_all  [k] __intel_pmu_enable_all    4
     33.33%  perf     [kernel.vmlinux]      [k] 
native_write_msr          [k] intel_pmu_lbr_enable_all  -


#
# (Tip: Show current config key-value pairs: perf config --list)
#

#
# Branch Statistics:
#
     CROSS_4K: 100.0%
         CALL:  33.3%
          RET:  66.7%

Thanks
Jin Yao